Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: City of Boerne v. Flores | Statement: [Tennessee v. Lane, followsCaseLawFrom, City of Boerne v. Flores]

Target entity: City of Boerne v. Flores
Context triple: [Tennessee v. Lane, followsCaseLawFrom, City of Boerne v. Flores]

• A. City of Boerne v. Flores chosen
  City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
• B. Van Orden v. Perry
  Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
• C. League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
  League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court case that examined the constitutionality of Texas’s congressional redistricting plan, particularly its implications for Latino voting rights and partisan gerrymandering.
• D. Eisenstadt v. Baird
  Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
• E. Garcetti v. Ceballos
  Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: followsCaseLawFrom
Context triple: [Tennessee v. Lane, followsCaseLawFrom, City of Boerne v. Flores]

• A. followsLegalAuthority
  Indicates that one entity acts in accordance with, or is subordinate to, the legal power, rules, or jurisdiction exercised by another entity.
• B. appliesLawThrough
  Indicates that one entity enforces, implements, or carries out a law or legal rule by means of another entity or mechanism.
• C. appliedLawFrom
  Indicates that a specific law or legal provision was applied or derived from a particular source, context, or jurisdiction in a legal decision or situation.
• D. legalPrecedentInvolved chosen
  Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
• E. legalCitationSystem
  Indicates a system or convention used to reference and identify legal authorities such as cases, statutes, or regulations.
• F. None of above.