Tennessee v. Lane

E403297

Tennessee v. Lane is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to require states to provide accessible courthouses under the Americans with Disabilities Act as a valid enforcement of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Tennessee v. Lane canonical 4

Statements (49)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Fourteenth Amendment enforcement case
United States Supreme Court case
landmark disability rights case
aroseInJurisdiction United States of America
surface form: United States
concernsIssue congruence and proportionality test for Section 5 legislation
obligations of states to provide accessible courthouses
state sovereign immunity
concernsRight fundamental right of access to the courts
decisionType opinion of the Court
distinguishesCase Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett
factPattern a court reporter with disabilities alleged denial of access to multiple county courthouses
a paraplegic criminal defendant was required to crawl up courthouse stairs to reach a courtroom
followsCaseLawFrom Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett
City of Boerne v. Flores
hasArgumentDate January 13, 2004
hasChiefJusticeAtDecision William H. Rehnquist
hasCitation 541 U.S. 509
hasConcurrenceBy David H. Souter
surface form: Justice David H. Souter

Ruth Bader Ginsburg
surface form: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Sandra Day O’Connor
surface form: Justice Sandra Day O’Connor

Stephen G. Breyer
surface form: Justice Stephen G. Breyer
hasCourt Supreme Court of the United States
hasDecisionDate May 17, 2004
hasDissentBy William H. Rehnquist
surface form: Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist

Anthony M. Kennedy
surface form: Justice Anthony M. Kennedy

Antonin Scalia
surface form: Justice Antonin Scalia

Clarence Thomas
surface form: Justice Clarence Thomas
hasDocketNumber 02-1667
hasMajorityOpinionBy John Paul Stevens
surface form: Justice John Paul Stevens
hasPetitioner Beverly Jones NERFINISHED
George Lane
hasRespondent Tennessee
surface form: State of Tennessee
hasVoteSplit 5-4
holds Congress validly abrogated state sovereign immunity under Title II of the ADA as applied to access to courts
States may be sued for money damages in federal court for failing to provide disabled persons access to judicial services under Title II of the ADA
ADA Title II
surface form: Title II of the ADA is a proper exercise of Congress’s enforcement power under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment as applied to cases implicating the fundamental right of access to the courts
involvesConstitutionalProvision Due Process Clause
surface form: Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Equal Protection Clause
surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Fourteenth Amendment
surface form: Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment
involvesPartyStatus individuals with mobility impairments
involvesStatute Americans with Disabilities Act
surface form: Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
involvesStatuteTitle Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act
jurisdictionLevel federal question jurisdiction
legalEffect affirmed the constitutionality of Title II of the ADA as applied to access to courts
expanded remedies available to disabled individuals against states for denial of court access
relatesTo disability discrimination in public services
enforcement of civil rights against states
subjectMatter public services and programs provided by state and local governments

Referenced by (4)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.