Triple

T22137132
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States disability rights law E547057 entity
Predicate includesCaseLaw P72403 FINISHED
Object Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey | Statement: [United States disability rights law, includesCaseLaw, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey
Context triple: [United States disability rights law, includesCaseLaw, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey]
  • A. Murdock v. Pennsylvania
    Murdock v. Pennsylvania is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that held it unconstitutional to impose a license tax on the distribution of religious literature, reinforcing First Amendment protections for religious proselytizing.
  • B. Pennsylvania v. Mimms
    Pennsylvania v. Mimms is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that held police officers may order a lawfully stopped driver out of their vehicle without violating the Fourth Amendment.
  • C. County of Allegheny v. ACLU
    County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
  • D. Maryland v. Wirtz
    Maryland v. Wirtz was a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the extension of federal minimum wage and overtime provisions to employees of state-operated schools and hospitals under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
  • E. Strickland v. Washington
    Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey
Target entity description: Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to state prisons and inmates.
  • A. Murdock v. Pennsylvania
    Murdock v. Pennsylvania is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that held it unconstitutional to impose a license tax on the distribution of religious literature, reinforcing First Amendment protections for religious proselytizing.
  • B. Pennsylvania v. Mimms
    Pennsylvania v. Mimms is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that held police officers may order a lawfully stopped driver out of their vehicle without violating the Fourth Amendment.
  • C. County of Allegheny v. ACLU
    County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
  • D. Maryland v. Wirtz
    Maryland v. Wirtz was a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the extension of federal minimum wage and overtime provisions to employees of state-operated schools and hospitals under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
  • E. Strickland v. Washington
    Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e3a95d88190a3bd80d9471976c3 completed April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f129bac764819099ba4896a161ef1c completed April 28, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:32 p.m.