Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Alexander v. Choate | Statement: [United States disability rights law, includesCaseLaw, Alexander v. Choate]

Target entity: Alexander v. Choate
Context triple: [United States disability rights law, includesCaseLaw, Alexander v. Choate]

• A. Alexander v. Sandoval
  Alexander v. Sandoval is a 2001 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held there is no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
• B. Lucas v. Earl
  Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
• C. Ray v. Blair
  Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
• D. Ogden v. Saunders
  Ogden v. Saunders is an 1827 U.S. Supreme Court case, known for Justice Bushrod Washington’s opinion addressing the constitutionality of state bankruptcy laws under the Contract Clause.
• E. Leach v. Carlile
  Leach v. Carlile is a United States Supreme Court decision issued during Chief Justice Edward Douglass White’s tenure, addressing questions of federal law under the early 20th-century Court.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Alexander v. Choate
Target entity description: Alexander v. Choate is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of protections against disability discrimination under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, particularly regarding neutral policies with disparate impacts on people with disabilities.

• A. Alexander v. Sandoval
  Alexander v. Sandoval is a 2001 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held there is no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
• B. Lucas v. Earl
  Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
• C. Ray v. Blair
  Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
• D. Ogden v. Saunders
  Ogden v. Saunders is an 1827 U.S. Supreme Court case, known for Justice Bushrod Washington’s opinion addressing the constitutionality of state bankruptcy laws under the Contract Clause.
• E. Leach v. Carlile
  Leach v. Carlile is a United States Supreme Court decision issued during Chief Justice Edward Douglass White’s tenure, addressing questions of federal law under the early 20th-century Court.
• F. None of above. chosen