Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Griswold v. Connecticut | Statement: [Carey v. Population Services International, relatedToPrecedent, Griswold v. Connecticut]

Target entity: Griswold v. Connecticut
Context triple: [Carey v. Population Services International, relatedToPrecedent, Griswold v. Connecticut]

• A. Griswold v. Connecticut chosen
  Griswold v. Connecticut is a landmark 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case that recognized a constitutional right to marital privacy and struck down a state ban on contraceptive use by married couples.
• B. Hepburn v. Griswold
  Hepburn v. Griswold was an 1870 U.S. Supreme Court decision that initially held it unconstitutional to make paper money legal tender for preexisting debts under the Civil War–era Legal Tender Acts.
• C. Cantwell v. Connecticut
  Cantwell v. Connecticut is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that first applied the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause to the states, striking down a state law that improperly restricted religious proselytizing.
• D. Edwards v. California
  Edwards v. California is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a California law restricting the bringing of indigent persons into the state, holding that such limits on interstate movement violated the Commerce Clause.
• E. Eisenstadt v. Baird
  Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: relatedToPrecedent
Context triple: [Carey v. Population Services International, relatedToPrecedent, Griswold v. Connecticut]

• A. typicalPrecedent
  Indicates that one situation, case, or event serves as a standard or commonly followed example for how similar later situations are handled.
• B. relatedCase
  Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
• C. precedentFor
  Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
• D. legalPrecedentInvolved chosen
  Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
• E. roleInPrecedent
  Indicates that an entity holds a specific role or function within a cited precedent, such as a prior case, decision, or example.
• F. None of above.