Kivalina v. ExxonMobil

E484115

Kivalina v. ExxonMobil is a landmark U.S. climate change lawsuit in which an Alaskan village sued major energy companies for damages allegedly caused by global warming and resulting coastal erosion.

Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

Observed surface forms (1)

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States federal court case
climate change lawsuit
public nuisance case
tort action
allegesCause defendants’ contribution to climate change
greenhouse gas emissions from defendants
allegesHarm coastal erosion
global warming
loss of sea ice protection
sea level rise
threat to habitability of Kivalina
appealDecisionDate 2012-09-21
appealOutcome dismissal affirmed
characterizedAs landmark climate change litigation
citation Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp., 663 F. Supp. 2d 863 (N.D. Cal. 2009) NERFINISHED
Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp., 696 F.3d 849 (9th Cir. 2012) NERFINISHED
concernsCommunity Inupiat village of Kivalina NERFINISHED
courtHeld federal common law nuisance claims displaced by Clean Air Act
courtReliedOn American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut NERFINISHED
decisionDate 2009-10-15
districtCourtOutcome case dismissed
filedInCourt United States District Court for the Northern District of California NERFINISHED
geographicContext Alaska NERFINISHED
hasDefendant American Electric Power Company, Inc. NERFINISHED
BP America, Inc. NERFINISHED
Chevron Corporation NERFINISHED
ConocoPhillips Company NERFINISHED
Duke Energy Corporation NERFINISHED
ExxonMobil Corporation NERFINISHED
Peabody Energy Corporation NERFINISHED
Royal Dutch Shell PLC NERFINISHED
other major energy companies
hasPlaintiff City of Kivalina NERFINISHED
Native Village of Kivalina NERFINISHED
keyIssue displacement of federal common law by statute
justiciability of climate change tort claims
political question doctrine
standing of plaintiffs
legalBasisAlleged federal common law of public nuisance
state law nuisance claims
onAppealTo United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit NERFINISHED
plaintiffsSeek damages for past and future harms
funds to relocate the village
relatedTo climate change tort jurisprudence in the United States
environmental justice issues for Indigenous communities
seeksRemedy costs of relocation of Kivalina
monetary damages
subjectMatter liability of energy companies for climate change impacts

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Kivalina hasLegalCase Kivalina v. ExxonMobil
Kivalina hasLegalCase Kivalina v. ExxonMobil
this entity surface form: Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp.