Triple

T4981633
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kivalina E111898 entity
Predicate hasLegalCase P3010 FINISHED
Object Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp. E484115 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp. | Statement: [Kivalina, hasLegalCase, Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp.
Context triple: [Kivalina, hasLegalCase, Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp.]
  • A. Kivalina v. ExxonMobil chosen
    Kivalina v. ExxonMobil is a landmark U.S. climate change lawsuit in which an Alaskan village sued major energy companies for damages allegedly caused by global warming and resulting coastal erosion.
  • B. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
    Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. is a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the extraterritorial application of the Alien Tort Statute in human rights lawsuits against corporations for conduct occurring abroad.
  • C. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC
    Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited courts’ ability to impose additional procedural requirements on federal agencies beyond those mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act and relevant statutes.
  • D. Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs
    Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the federal Apology Resolution did not strip Hawaii of its authority to sell or transfer certain former crown lands, limiting the resolution’s legal effect.
  • E. Heiltsuk Nation v. British Columbia
    Heiltsuk Nation v. British Columbia is a Canadian court case in which the Heiltsuk First Nation challenged provincial authority and asserted their Aboriginal rights and title over traditional territories and marine resources on the Pacific coast.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69bd441adc208190b70a033a0741d01e completed March 20, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69bd725310088190a44b5c02658edc52 completed March 20, 2026, 4:14 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69be924befc08190a077adca99fb4b86 completed March 21, 2026, 12:42 p.m.
Created at: March 20, 2026, 1:33 p.m.