Triple
T6673196
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Paula Corbin Jones |
E151782
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalPrecedentInvolved |
P72403
|
FINISHED |
| Object | presidential immunity in civil suits |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: presidential immunity in civil suits | Statement: [Paula Corbin Jones, legalPrecedentInvolved, presidential immunity in civil suits]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalPrecedentInvolved Context triple: [Paula Corbin Jones, legalPrecedentInvolved, presidential immunity in civil suits]
-
A.
legalCaseAlongside
Indicates that two or more legal cases are proceeding in parallel or in coordination, such that they are related or handled together in some aspect of the legal process.
-
B.
hasCourtPrecedence
Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
-
C.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
-
D.
legalCodeFocus
Indicates that something is specifically concerned with, centered on, or primarily addressing a particular legal code or body of law.
-
E.
precedentInterpreted
Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c687f830bc81909eb8b04dbb8450b1 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6ce738fe88190a5557900efeec7ec |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c6ad09974c81908784300ae218961f |
completed | March 27, 2026, 4:15 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c6ce72809c8190be85f6e42ca1c8ea |
completed | March 27, 2026, 6:37 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:03 p.m.