Triple

T22137126
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States disability rights law E547057 entity
Predicate includesCaseLaw P72403 FINISHED
Object Tennessee v. Lane NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tennessee v. Lane | Statement: [United States disability rights law, includesCaseLaw, Tennessee v. Lane]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tennessee v. Lane
Context triple: [United States disability rights law, includesCaseLaw, Tennessee v. Lane]
  • A. Tennessee v. Lane chosen
    Tennessee v. Lane is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to require states to provide accessible courthouses under the Americans with Disabilities Act as a valid enforcement of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • B. Alabama v. Shelton
    Alabama v. Shelton is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a suspended sentence that may result in imprisonment cannot be imposed unless the defendant was afforded the right to counsel.
  • C. Kentucky v. Dennison
    Kentucky v. Dennison was an 1861 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that federal courts could not compel state governors to carry out interstate extradition.
  • D. Hamilton v. Alabama
    Hamilton v. Alabama is a 1961 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held an indigent defendant in a capital case has a constitutional right to counsel at arraignment, treating that stage as a critical point in the criminal process.
  • E. Duncan v. Louisiana
    Duncan v. Louisiana is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial in criminal cases applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e3a95d88190a3bd80d9471976c3 completed April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f129bac764819099ba4896a161ef1c completed April 28, 2026, 9:42 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:32 p.m.