precedentFor
P3138
predicate
Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
All labels observed (38)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| precedentFor canonical | 344 |
| precedentStatus | 51 |
| isPrecedentFor | 15 |
| setsPrecedentFor | 15 |
| precedent | 12 |
| precedentReliedOn | 12 |
| usedAsPrecedentIn | 12 |
| hasPrecedent | 9 |
| appliedPrecedent | 8 |
| reliesOnPrecedent | 8 |
| precedentEstablished | 7 |
| precedentOf | 7 |
| setPrecedentFor | 7 |
| appliesPrecedent | 5 |
| precedentCited | 5 |
| precedentialValue | 5 |
| citedAsPrecedentIn | 4 |
| establishedPrecedentFor | 4 |
| followedPrecedent | 4 |
| hasLegalPrecedent | 4 |
| precededByCase | 4 |
| hasPrecedentFor | 3 |
| isPrecedentIn | 3 |
| usedAsPrecedentFor | 3 |
| hasPrecedentInfluenceOn | 2 |
| hasPrecedentialValueFor | 2 |
| isKeyPrecedentFor | 2 |
| precedentialEffect | 2 |
| priorCase | 2 |
| hasLegalPrecedentFor | 1 |
| hasPrecedentValueIn | 1 |
| isCitedAsPrecedentFor | 1 |
| isPrecedentSourceFor | 1 |
| precedentType | 1 |
| precedentUsedFor | 1 |
| precedentialScope | 1 |
| priorCaseReferenced | 1 |
| priorCaseReliedOn | 1 |
Description generation (PDg)
The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.
Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning. # Instructions Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. # Response Format Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: precedentFor
Generated description
Indicates that one situation, decision, or case serves as an authoritative example or basis for deciding or interpreting another.
Sample triples (570)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| Operation Orchard | Operation Opera via predicate surface "precedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Arizona v. Johnson | Terry v. Ohio via predicate surface "appliesPrecedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Arizona v. Johnson | Pennsylvania v. Mimms via predicate surface "appliesPrecedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Arizona v. Johnson | Maryland v. Wilson via predicate surface "appliesPrecedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
|
The rigid two-pronged Aguilar–Spinelli test is abandoned in favor of a more flexible totality of the circumstances approach.
surface form:
Illinois v. Gates
|
later Fourth Amendment probable cause cases ⓘ |
| Aguilar v. Texas | partially superseded by Illinois v. Gates with respect to the rigid application of the two-pronged test. via predicate surface "precedentStatus" ⓘ |
| Spinelli v. United States | Aguilar–Spinelli test for evaluating informant tips in probable cause determinations NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| United States v. Von's Grocery Co. | strict structural approach to merger analysis ⓘ |
|
Wilson v. New (1917)
surface form:
Wilson v. New
|
later cases upholding federal labor standards ⓘ |
|
Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al.
surface form:
Baker v. Carr
|
Reynolds v. Sims NERFINISHED ⓘ |
|
Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al.
surface form:
Baker v. Carr
|
Wesberry v. Sanders NERFINISHED ⓘ |
|
Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al.
surface form:
Baker v. Carr
|
one person, one vote principle ⓘ |
| Goldman v. United States | permissibility of certain forms of electronic surveillance without a warrant ⓘ |
| Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner | election law cases interpreting Article 324 via predicate surface "usedAsPrecedentIn" ⓘ |
| Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner | cases on judicial review of administrative orders via predicate surface "usedAsPrecedentIn" ⓘ |
| Waman Rao v. Union of India | Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala via predicate surface "followedPrecedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India | Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala via predicate surface "precedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Jacobellis v. Ohio | later obscenity cases interpreting the First Amendment ⓘ |
| Navajo Nation court decisions | future Navajo Nation cases ⓘ |
| Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc. | narrow interpretation of disability under the ADA prior to 2008 ⓘ |
| Moore v. Texas | standards for evaluating intellectual disability in later capital cases ⓘ |
| Berman v. Parker | Kelo v. City of New London NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff | broad deference to legislative judgments about public use ⓘ |
| Miller v Jackson | balancing test for injunctions in nuisance cases ⓘ |
| D & C Builders Ltd v Rees | Foakes v Beer via predicate surface "appliesPrecedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores | standing in private Rule 10b-5 actions ⓘ |
| Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores | limitation of implied private rights of action under federal securities laws ⓘ |
| SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. | modern U.S. insider trading enforcement framework ⓘ |
| Twining v. New Jersey | non-incorporation of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination ⓘ |
| Adamson v. California | later undermined by incorporation-era decisions via predicate surface "precedentStatus" ⓘ |
| Griffin v. California | Carter v. Kentucky NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Griffin v. California | Lakeside v. Oregon NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Griffin v. California | Mitchell v. United States NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| 424 U.S. 351 | scope of state power in regulating employment of unauthorized immigrants ⓘ |
| Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States | Johnson v. M’Intosh via predicate surface "reliesOnPrecedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States | United States v. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Co. via predicate surface "reliesOnPrecedent" NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Hamdi v. Rumsfeld | judicial review of enemy combatant detentions ⓘ |
| Calico Mine Ride | helped establish Knott's Berry Farm as a theme park via predicate surface "precedent" ⓘ |
| Hamilton v. Alabama | right to counsel at critical stages of prosecution ⓘ |
| Amanda Bonner | strong female leads in legal comedies via predicate surface "setsPrecedentFor" ⓘ |
| Herndon v. Lowry | expanded protection for political advocacy under the First Amendment ⓘ |
| Herndon v. Lowry | limits on state power to criminalize radical political speech ⓘ |
| Crowell v. Benson | judicial review of agency determinations of jurisdictional facts via predicate surface "setsPrecedentFor" ⓘ |
| Crowell v. Benson | treatment of agency findings of fact as final when supported by evidence via predicate surface "setsPrecedentFor" ⓘ |
| Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins | leading case on the Erie doctrine via predicate surface "precedentStatus" ⓘ |
| United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co. | cases expanding federal power over waterways ⓘ |
| Federal Baseball Club v. National League | continued antitrust exemption for MLB franchise relocation rules ⓘ |
| Federal Baseball Club v. National League | continued antitrust exemption for MLB reserve system until later reforms ⓘ |
|
42 U.S.C. § 1981 covers discrimination in the making and enforcement of contracts, but not conduct by the employer after the contract relation has been established
surface form:
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union
|
limiting section 1981 to contract formation and enforcement prior to 1991 amendments ⓘ |
| Runyon v. McCrary | application of § 1981 to private contractual relationships ⓘ |