Spinelli v. United States

E522193

Spinelli v. United States is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the standards for evaluating probable cause based on informants’ tips under the Fourth Amendment, later modified by the more flexible totality-of-the-circumstances test in Illinois v. Gates.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (40)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
appliedTest Aguilar two-pronged test NERFINISHED
areaOfLaw United States constitutional law
United States criminal procedure
citation 21 L. Ed. 2d 637
393 U.S. 410
89 S. Ct. 584
clarified requirements for corroboration of informant information by independent police investigation
constitutionalProvision Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1969-01-27
dissentingOpinionBy Justice Byron R. White NERFINISHED
Justice Hugo L. Black NERFINISHED
Justice Potter Stewart NERFINISHED
Justice William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED
fullCaseName William Spinelli v. United States NERFINISHED
holding An informant’s tip must be evaluated under a two-pronged test requiring a showing of the informant’s basis of knowledge and veracity or reliability.
The affidavit supporting the search warrant did not establish probable cause under the standards required by the Fourth Amendment.
impact Influenced state and federal standards for evaluating informant-based probable cause until Illinois v. Gates.
issue Whether an FBI affidavit relying in part on an informant’s tip established probable cause for issuance of a search warrant.
joinedByInMajority Chief Justice Earl Warren NERFINISHED
Justice Abe Fortas NERFINISHED
Justice Thurgood Marshall NERFINISHED
Justice William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED
Justice William O. Douglas NERFINISHED
jurisdiction federal
laterModifiedBy Illinois v. Gates NERFINISHED
laterModifiedByDoctrine totality-of-the-circumstances test for probable cause
legalSubject criminal procedure
search and seizure
legalTest Aguilar–Spinelli test NERFINISHED
majorityOpinionBy Justice John Marshall Harlan II NERFINISHED
petitioner William Spinelli NERFINISHED
precedentFor Aguilar–Spinelli test for evaluating informant tips in probable cause determinations NERFINISHED
refined standards for evaluating probable cause based on informants’ tips
relatedCase Aguilar v. Texas NERFINISHED
Illinois v. Gates NERFINISHED
respondent United States NERFINISHED
result Conviction reversed
term Warren Court NERFINISHED

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Illinois v. Gates relatedCase Spinelli v. United States