Triple

T21190319
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Spinelli v. United States E522193 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object William Spinelli v. United States — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: William Spinelli v. United States | Statement: [Spinelli v. United States, fullCaseName, William Spinelli v. United States]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: William Spinelli v. United States
Context triple: [Spinelli v. United States, fullCaseName, William Spinelli v. United States]
  • A. Spinelli v. United States chosen
    Spinelli v. United States is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the standards for evaluating probable cause based on informants’ tips under the Fourth Amendment, later modified by the more flexible totality-of-the-circumstances test in Illinois v. Gates.
  • B. United States v. Giordano
    United States v. Giordano is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the strict procedural requirements for federal wiretap authorizations and limited who may approve such surveillance orders.
  • C. United States v. Bajakajian
    United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
  • D. United States v. Castleman
    United States v. Castleman is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the definition of “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence” for purposes of federal firearm possession prohibitions.
  • E. Durousseau v. United States
    Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b51061388190aa03f19700d3ef04 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e733372b488190920174955b4b9172 completed April 21, 2026, 8:20 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:07 p.m.