Triple
T21190343
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Spinelli v. United States |
E522193
|
entity |
| Predicate | laterModifiedByDoctrine |
P143224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | totality-of-the-circumstances test for probable cause |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: totality-of-the-circumstances test for probable cause | Statement: [Spinelli v. United States, laterModifiedByDoctrine, totality-of-the-circumstances test for probable cause]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterModifiedByDoctrine Context triple: [Spinelli v. United States, laterModifiedByDoctrine, totality-of-the-circumstances test for probable cause]
-
A.
replacedByDoctrine
Indicates that one doctrine has been superseded and taken its place by another doctrine.
-
B.
usesDoctrine
Indicates that one entity applies, follows, or relies on a particular doctrine in its actions or reasoning.
-
C.
extendsDoctrineTo
Indicates that a doctrine, principle, or rule is applied or carried over from one context, entity, or domain to another, broadening its scope or coverage.
-
D.
createdDoctrine
Indicates that an entity originated, formulated, or established a particular doctrine, theory, or set of principles.
-
E.
extendsDoctrineFrom
Indicates that one doctrine is derived, developed, or expanded from another existing doctrine.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0b51061388190aa03f19700d3ef04 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e733372b488190920174955b4b9172 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 8:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5f6027c248190a170a36612bd337e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 9:46 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e5f993240c8190847c0b08e65726c8 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 3:07 p.m.