Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Aguilar two-pronged test | Statement: [Spinelli v. United States, appliedTest, Aguilar two-pronged test]

Target entity: Aguilar two-pronged test
Context triple: [Spinelli v. United States, appliedTest, Aguilar two-pronged test]

• A. Aguilar v. Texas
  Aguilar v. Texas is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established a two-pronged test for evaluating the sufficiency of informants’ tips in supporting probable cause for search warrants.
• B. Aguilar v. Felton
  Aguilar v. Felton was a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held it unconstitutional for public school teachers to provide remedial education on the premises of religious schools under a federal aid program, based on Establishment Clause concerns.
• C. Aguilar–Spinelli test for evaluating informant tips in probable cause determinations
  The Aguilar–Spinelli test is a former U.S. constitutional standard that required courts to assess both an informant’s basis of knowledge and veracity or reliability when determining whether their tip could establish probable cause for a search or arrest.
• D. Aguilar–Spinelli test chosen
  The Aguilar–Spinelli test is a former U.S. legal standard that strictly governed when hearsay information from informants could establish probable cause for search warrants, requiring proof of both the informant’s basis of knowledge and veracity.
• E. The rigid two-pronged Aguilar–Spinelli test is abandoned in favor of a more flexible totality of the circumstances approach.
  This is the central holding of Illinois v. Gates, a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped the standard for evaluating probable cause based on informants’ tips under the Fourth Amendment.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.