Twining v. New Jersey

E572465

Twining v. New Jersey is a 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination did not apply to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, a position later rejected by the Court.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Twining v. New Jersey canonical 1

Statements (43)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
criminal procedure case
areaOfLaw constitutional law
criminal procedure
citation 211 U.S. 78
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1908-11-09
decisionType 5–4 decision
dissentingJustice Rufus W. Peckham NERFINISHED
William R. Day NERFINISHED
effect allowed states to draw adverse inferences from a defendant’s failure to testify until later overruled
fullCaseName Albert C. Twining and David C. Cornell v. State of New Jersey NERFINISHED
holding the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination does not apply to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment
languageOfWork English
laterOverruledBy Malloy v. Hogan NERFINISHED
Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964) NERFINISHED
legalIssue whether the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment
majorityJustices David J. Brewer NERFINISHED
Edward D. White NERFINISHED
John Marshall Harlan NERFINISHED
Joseph McKenna NERFINISHED
Melville W. Fuller NERFINISHED
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. NERFINISHED
William Henry Moody NERFINISHED
majorityOpinionBy William Henry Moody NERFINISHED
pageInUnitedStatesReports 78
partOf incorporation case law of the United States Supreme Court
petitioner Albert C. Twining NERFINISHED
David C. Cornell NERFINISHED
precedentFor non-incorporation of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
relatedCase Malloy v. Hogan NERFINISHED
Palko v. Connecticut NERFINISHED
relatedDoctrine privilege against self-incrimination
selective incorporation
respondent State of New Jersey NERFINISHED
stateInvolved New Jersey NERFINISHED
subsequentHistory position on self-incrimination and incorporation later rejected by the Supreme Court
topic application of the Bill of Rights to the states
volumeInUnitedStatesReports 211
yearDecided 1908

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Malloy v. Hogan overruledPrecedent Twining v. New Jersey