Triple

T23512553
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Twining v. New Jersey E572465 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Albert C. Twining and David C. Cornell v. State of New Jersey — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Albert C. Twining and David C. Cornell v. State of New Jersey | Statement: [Twining v. New Jersey, fullCaseName, Albert C. Twining and David C. Cornell v. State of New Jersey]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Albert C. Twining and David C. Cornell v. State of New Jersey
Context triple: [Twining v. New Jersey, fullCaseName, Albert C. Twining and David C. Cornell v. State of New Jersey]
  • A. Twining v. New Jersey chosen
    Twining v. New Jersey is a 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination did not apply to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, a position later rejected by the Court.
  • B. Apprendi v. New Jersey
    Apprendi v. New Jersey is a landmark 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases a criminal defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • C. United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey
    United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the limits of state power to impair public contracts under the Constitution’s Contract Clause.
  • D. Nebbia v. New York
    Nebbia v. New York is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state regulation of milk prices and marked a major retreat from the Lochner-era limits on economic regulation under the Due Process Clause.
  • E. New York Central Railroad Co. v. Winfield
    New York Central Railroad Co. v. Winfield is a 1917 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal authority over railroad worker injury claims under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, limiting the application of state workers’ compensation laws in such cases.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b5e4208190bac8a6509867e394 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1aa7f583881909e78e8fe2e6e25fe completed April 29, 2026, 6:51 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:07 p.m.