Wilson v. New (1917)

E541179

Wilson v. New (1917) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority to regulate railroad workers’ hours and wages, affirming the constitutionality of progressive labor legislation.

Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

Observed surface forms (1)

Surface form Occurrences
Wilson v. New 0

Statements (47)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
constitutional law case
landmark labor law case
areaOfLaw commerce clause jurisprudence
constitutional law
federal regulatory power
labor law
branchOfGovernmentInvolved judicial branch of the United States
citation 243 U.S. 332
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment NERFINISHED
context enacted in response to threatened nationwide railroad strike in 1916
country United States of America
surface form: United States
courtLevel court of last resort
decidedBy Supreme Court of the United States NERFINISHED
decisionDate 1917
effect affirmed broad federal power to set minimum labor standards for interstate railroad workers
strengthened the legal foundation for later federal labor regulations
fullCaseName Wilson v. New NERFINISHED
governingLaw United States Constitution
federal statutory law
hasJurisdiction United States federal law NERFINISHED
historicalSignificance early Supreme Court approval of federal minimum labor standards in transportation
helped legitimize progressive labor reforms at the federal level
holding Congress has constitutional authority to regulate the hours and wages of railroad employees engaged in interstate commerce
federal regulation of railroad workers’ hours and wages does not violate the Due Process Clause
the Adamson Act is a valid exercise of congressional power under the Commerce Clause NERFINISHED
involvesStatute Adamson Act NERFINISHED
involvesSubjectMatter hours of service for railroad employees
railroad labor regulation
wages of railroad workers
languageOfProceedings English
legalIssue constitutionality of federal regulation of railroad workers’ hours and wages
scope of Congress’s power over interstate commerce
validity of the Adamson Act of 1916
partyTypeInvolved federal government of the United States NERFINISHED
railroad companies
railroad employees
petitioner Woodrow Wilson, President of the United States NERFINISHED
precedentFor later cases upholding federal labor standards
recognizedPower Congressional power to impose an eight-hour workday on interstate railroads
Congressional power to influence wage levels in interstate transportation industries
relatedLegislation federal railroad labor statutes
relatedTo federal authority over interstate railroads
progressive era labor legislation
respondent New NERFINISHED
timePeriod Progressive Era NERFINISHED

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Adamson Act testedInCase Wilson v. New (1917)