Triple
T5715875
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Adamson Act |
E126020
|
entity |
| Predicate | testedInCase |
P66050
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Wilson v. New (1917)
Wilson v. New (1917) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority to regulate railroad workers’ hours and wages, affirming the constitutionality of progressive labor legislation.
|
E541179
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Wilson v. New (1917) | Statement: [Adamson Act, testedInCase, Wilson v. New (1917)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Wilson v. New (1917) Context triple: [Adamson Act, testedInCase, Wilson v. New (1917)]
-
A.
Downes v. Bidwell
Downes v. Bidwell is a 1901 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped establish the "Insular Cases" doctrine, holding that full constitutional rights do not automatically extend to all territories under American control.
-
B.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
C.
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld minimum wage laws and effectively ended the Lochner era by allowing greater government regulation of economic conditions.
-
D.
Ingraham v. Wright
Ingraham v. Wright is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment does not apply to corporal punishment in public schools and that due process does not require a prior hearing before such discipline is imposed.
-
E.
Toomer v. Witsell
Toomer v. Witsell is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly interpreted the Privileges and Immunities Clause by striking down discriminatory state licensing fees imposed on out-of-state commercial fishermen.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Wilson v. New (1917) Triple: [Adamson Act, testedInCase, Wilson v. New (1917)]
Generated description
Wilson v. New (1917) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority to regulate railroad workers’ hours and wages, affirming the constitutionality of progressive labor legislation.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Wilson v. New (1917) Target entity description: Wilson v. New (1917) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority to regulate railroad workers’ hours and wages, affirming the constitutionality of progressive labor legislation.
-
A.
Downes v. Bidwell
Downes v. Bidwell is a 1901 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped establish the "Insular Cases" doctrine, holding that full constitutional rights do not automatically extend to all territories under American control.
-
B.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
C.
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld minimum wage laws and effectively ended the Lochner era by allowing greater government regulation of economic conditions.
-
D.
Ingraham v. Wright
Ingraham v. Wright is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment does not apply to corporal punishment in public schools and that due process does not require a prior hearing before such discipline is imposed.
-
E.
Toomer v. Witsell
Toomer v. Witsell is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly interpreted the Privileges and Immunities Clause by striking down discriminatory state licensing fees imposed on out-of-state commercial fishermen.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: testedInCase Context triple: [Adamson Act, testedInCase, Wilson v. New (1917)]
-
A.
testedFor
Indicates that an entity has been examined or analyzed to determine the presence, absence, or level of another specified entity or condition.
-
B.
testsIn
Indicates that one entity conducts or performs tests within, on, or using another entity.
-
C.
testedOn
Indicates that an entity has been used as the subject or material in a test, experiment, or evaluation performed by another entity.
-
D.
appliedTest
Indicates that a test has been administered or carried out on a particular subject or object.
-
E.
isUsedToTest
Indicates that one entity serves as a means or tool for evaluating, examining, or verifying another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (7 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c0082e3d548190950169847b43043b |
completed | March 22, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c029014588819094a2a0f6f9b66bab |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:38 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c05a77d6b081908db6e64c5a361282 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:09 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69c05c75179c819085bf56340363b48c |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:17 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69c05d2ef9488190ac0111cb6a94b1d0 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69c021c47f4c81909e6849c3be3e951c |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:07 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69c028fec2bc819083f5dca6a8d9d435 |
completed | March 22, 2026, 5:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 22, 2026, 3:46 p.m.