Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Wilson v. New | Statement: [Wilson v. New, fullCaseName, Wilson v. New]

Target entity: Wilson v. New
Context triple: [Wilson v. New, fullCaseName, Wilson v. New]

• A. Wilson v. New (1917)
  Wilson v. New (1917) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority to regulate railroad workers’ hours and wages, affirming the constitutionality of progressive labor legislation.
• B. Gooding v. Wilson
  Gooding v. Wilson is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the “fighting words” doctrine and struck down a Georgia statute as unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.
• C. Washington v. Davis
  Washington v. Davis is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that held laws or policies with a racially disproportionate impact do not violate the Equal Protection Clause absent proof of discriminatory intent.
• D. Bush v. Vera
  Bush v. Vera is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied and extended the racial gerrymandering principles from Shaw v. Reno to invalidate certain Texas congressional districts drawn predominantly on the basis of race.
• E. Davis v. Washington
  Davis v. Washington is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that further defined the scope of the Confrontation Clause by clarifying when statements made to law enforcement are considered “testimonial” and thus subject to the rule announced in Crawford v. Washington.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Wilson v. New
Target entity description: Wilson v. New was a 1917 United States Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s authority to impose an eight-hour workday and wage structure on railroad workers to avert a nationwide strike.

• A. Wilson v. New (1917) chosen
  Wilson v. New (1917) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority to regulate railroad workers’ hours and wages, affirming the constitutionality of progressive labor legislation.
• B. Gooding v. Wilson
  Gooding v. Wilson is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the “fighting words” doctrine and struck down a Georgia statute as unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.
• C. Washington v. Davis
  Washington v. Davis is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that held laws or policies with a racially disproportionate impact do not violate the Equal Protection Clause absent proof of discriminatory intent.
• D. Bush v. Vera
  Bush v. Vera is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied and extended the racial gerrymandering principles from Shaw v. Reno to invalidate certain Texas congressional districts drawn predominantly on the basis of race.
• E. Davis v. Washington
  Davis v. Washington is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that further defined the scope of the Confrontation Clause by clarifying when statements made to law enforcement are considered “testimonial” and thus subject to the rule announced in Crawford v. Washington.
• F. None of above.