United States v. Von's Grocery Co.

E530385

United States v. Von's Grocery Co. is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that struck down a supermarket merger for allegedly increasing market concentration, later criticized as an overreach in merger enforcement.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (39)

Predicate Object
instanceOf U.S. Supreme Court case
antitrust case
caseType civil enforcement action
chiefJusticeAtTime Earl Warren NERFINISHED
citation 384 U.S. 270
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1966
defendant Shopping Bag Food Stores NERFINISHED
Von's Grocery Company NERFINISHED
enforcementAgency U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division NERFINISHED
era Warren Court NERFINISHED
holding the merger was unlawful because it might substantially lessen competition
the supermarket merger violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act
impact influenced 1960s merger enforcement policy
jurisdiction United States federal law
languageOfProceeding English
laterCriticism criticized as overreach in merger enforcement
criticized for focusing on concentration trends rather than competitive effects
legalArea antitrust law
competition law
legalIssue Section 7 of the Clayton Act NERFINISHED
market concentration
merger enforcement
majorityOpinionBy Justice Hugo Black NERFINISHED
market Los Angeles grocery retail market
outcome merger struck down
plaintiff United States NERFINISHED
precedentFor strict structural approach to merger analysis
reasoning trend toward concentration in the grocery market justified blocking the merger
relatedCase Brown Shoe Co. v. United States NERFINISHED
United States v. Philadelphia National Bank NERFINISHED
relatedConcept incipiency standard under Section 7
structural presumption in merger law
statuteInterpreted Clayton Act NERFINISHED
Section 7 of the Clayton Act NERFINISHED
subjectMatter supermarket merger
subsequentTreatment narrowed by later, more effects-based merger decisions
vote 6–2

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

The Antitrust Paradox criticizes United States v. Von's Grocery Co.