Hamilton v. Alabama

E589327

Hamilton v. Alabama is a 1961 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held an indigent defendant in a capital case has a constitutional right to counsel at arraignment, treating that stage as a critical point in the criminal process.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Hamilton v. Alabama canonical 1

Statements (37)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
criminal procedure case
right to counsel case
areaOfLaw constitutional law
criminal procedure
right to counsel jurisprudence
bindingOn state criminal proceedings
citation 368 U.S. 52
constitutionalProvision Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1961-11-13
decisionType unanimous decision
defendantStatus indigent defendant
effect expanded the scope of the right to counsel to include arraignment in capital cases
holding An indigent defendant in a capital case has a constitutional right to counsel at arraignment.
Arraignment in a capital case is a critical stage of the criminal process at which the defendant is entitled to counsel.
jurisdiction Alabama NERFINISHED
legalIssue critical stage of criminal proceedings
right to counsel at arraignment
opinionBy Justice Hugo Black NERFINISHED
pageInUnitedStatesReports 52
petitioner Hamilton NERFINISHED
precedentFor right to counsel at critical stages of prosecution
proceduralPosture review of state court conviction in a capital case
reasoning absence of counsel at arraignment in a capital case is a denial of due process.
relatedCase Gideon v. Wainwright NERFINISHED
White v. Maryland NERFINISHED
relatedConcept arraignment
critical stage doctrine
respondent State of Alabama NERFINISHED
result conviction reversed
stateLawContext Alabama criminal procedure
typeOfCase capital case
volumeInUnitedStatesReports 368
yearDecided 1961

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Powell v. Alabama precedentFor Hamilton v. Alabama