D & C Builders Ltd v Rees
E590299
D & C Builders Ltd v Rees is a leading English contract law case, best known for Lord Denning’s judgment on economic duress and the enforceability of part-payment settlements.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| D & C Builders Ltd v Rees canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T6384691 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: D & C Builders Ltd v Rees Context triple: [Lord Denning, notableWork, D & C Builders Ltd v Rees]
-
A.
Somerset v Stewart
Somerset v Stewart was a landmark 1772 English court case that effectively declared slavery unsupported by English common law, becoming a pivotal moment in the British abolitionist movement.
-
B.
Borgarting Court of Appeal
The Borgarting Court of Appeal is one of Norway’s regional appellate courts, handling appeals in both civil and criminal cases from lower courts within its jurisdiction.
-
C.
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state mortgage moratorium law during the Great Depression, marking a major limitation on the absolute scope of the Contract Clause.
-
D.
Stack v. Boyle
Stack v. Boyle is a 1951 U.S. Supreme Court case that established constitutional limits on excessive bail in the context of prosecutions under the Smith Act.
-
E.
United Building & Construction Trades Council v. Mayor and Council of Camden
United Building & Construction Trades Council v. Mayor and Council of Camden is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a city’s local-hiring ordinance could be challenged under the Privileges and Immunities Clause for discriminating against out-of-state workers.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: D & C Builders Ltd v Rees Target entity description: D & C Builders Ltd v Rees is a leading English contract law case, best known for Lord Denning’s judgment on economic duress and the enforceability of part-payment settlements.
-
A.
Somerset v Stewart
Somerset v Stewart was a landmark 1772 English court case that effectively declared slavery unsupported by English common law, becoming a pivotal moment in the British abolitionist movement.
-
B.
Borgarting Court of Appeal
The Borgarting Court of Appeal is one of Norway’s regional appellate courts, handling appeals in both civil and criminal cases from lower courts within its jurisdiction.
-
C.
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state mortgage moratorium law during the Great Depression, marking a major limitation on the absolute scope of the Contract Clause.
-
D.
Stack v. Boyle
Stack v. Boyle is a 1951 U.S. Supreme Court case that established constitutional limits on excessive bail in the context of prosecutions under the Smith Act.
-
E.
United Building & Construction Trades Council v. Mayor and Council of Camden
United Building & Construction Trades Council v. Mayor and Council of Camden is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a city’s local-hiring ordinance could be challenged under the Privileges and Immunities Clause for discriminating against out-of-state workers.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (43)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Court of Appeal of England and Wales decision
ⓘ
English contract law case ⓘ |
| appliesPrecedent | Foakes v Beer NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| clarifies |
limits of promissory estoppel where there is unfair pressure
ⓘ
that estoppel is an equitable doctrine requiring clean hands ⓘ |
| concerns |
part payment of an undisputed debt
ⓘ
settlement obtained under pressure ⓘ |
| hasAreaOfLaw |
accord and satisfaction
ⓘ
contract law ⓘ economic duress ⓘ part payment of debt ⓘ |
| hasClaimant | D & C Builders Ltd NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasCourt | Court of Appeal of England and Wales NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasDefendant |
Mr Rees
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Mrs Rees NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasJudge |
Danckwerts LJ
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Lord Denning MR NERFINISHED ⓘ Winn LJ NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasKeyConcept |
consideration
ⓘ
economic duress ⓘ inequitable conduct ⓘ promissory estoppel ⓘ |
| hasLeadingJudgmentBy | Lord Denning MR NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasLegalSystem | common law ⓘ |
| holds |
a creditor is not bound by a part-payment settlement obtained by improper pressure
ⓘ
a promise to accept less than the full debt is not binding without consideration unless protected by equity ⓘ equity will not assist a debtor who uses unfair pressure to secure a reduction ⓘ |
| involvesParty |
D & C Builders Ltd
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Mr Rees NERFINISHED ⓘ Mrs Rees NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| isFrequentlyCitedIn |
English contract law textbooks
ⓘ
cases on economic duress ⓘ cases on part payment of debt ⓘ |
| isLeadingCaseOn |
application of Foakes v Beer
ⓘ
economic duress in contract law ⓘ enforceability of part-payment settlements ⓘ |
| isReferencedAsAuthorityFor |
economic duress undermining apparent agreement
ⓘ
non-enforceability of part-payment settlements obtained by improper threats ⓘ |
| isTaughtIn | university contract law courses in the United Kingdom ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | England and Wales ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| supportsPrinciple |
a debtor cannot rely on estoppel when the creditor’s promise was obtained by intimidation or unfair pressure
ⓘ
equity may prevent a creditor from going back on a promise to accept less, if it is truly voluntary and not induced by duress ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: D & C Builders Ltd v Rees Description of subject: D & C Builders Ltd v Rees is a leading English contract law case, best known for Lord Denning’s judgment on economic duress and the enforceability of part-payment settlements.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.