Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson

E31056

Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson is a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case that first recognized workplace sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination actionable under Title VII.

Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

Observed surface forms (1)

Surface form Occurrences
Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson 1

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
employment discrimination case
sexual harassment case
areaOfLaw civil rights law
labor and employment law
arguedDate 1986-03-25
citation 477 U.S. 57
clarified that the correct inquiry is whether conduct was unwelcome, not whether the employee participated
that voluntariness is not a defense if sexual advances are unwelcome
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1986-06-19
docketNumber 84-1979
established standards for employer liability for acts of supervisors under Title VII
fullName Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson self-linksurface differs
surface form: Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson
holding Sexual harassment that creates a hostile or abusive work environment is actionable under Title VII even without economic or tangible job detriment
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
surface form: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits hostile work environment sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination
issue What standard governs employer liability for supervisor sexual harassment under Title VII
Whether a claim of hostile environment sexual harassment is cognizable under Title VII
joinedByInMajority Byron R. White
Harry A. Blackmun
John Paul Stevens
Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Sandra Day O’Connor
surface form: Sandra Day O'Connor

Thurgood Marshall
Warren E. Burger
William J. Brennan Jr.
jurisdiction United States of America
surface form: United States
language English
legalSubject Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
employer liability for supervisor harassment
hostile work environment
workplace sexual harassment
majorityOpinionBy William H. Rehnquist
page 57
petitioner Meritor Savings Bank, FSB
precedentFor Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton
Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.
recognized hostile work environment theory of sexual harassment under Title VII
recognizedAs first Supreme Court case to hold that workplace sexual harassment is sex discrimination under Title VII
landmark decision on workplace sexual harassment
relatedConcept hostile work environment sexual harassment
quid pro quo sexual harassment
reporter United States Reports
respondent Mechelle Vinson
volume 477
yearDecided 1986

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson fullName Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 landmarkCase Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson