Oregon v. Mitchell

E283068

Oregon v. Mitchell was a 1970 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of federal laws regulating state and local election procedures, including provisions of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Oregon v. Mitchell canonical 2

Statements (51)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
voting rights case
citation 400 U.S. 112
concerns Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970
constitutionality of federal regulation of state and local election procedures
federal power over voter qualifications
constitutionalProvision Article I of the United States Constitution
Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Fourteenth Amendment
surface form: Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
country United States of America
surface form: United States
decisionDate 1970-12-21
defendant John N. Mitchell
defendantRole United States Attorney General
surface form: Attorney General of the United States
effect prompted constitutional amendment to set nationwide voting age at 18
fullCaseName Oregon v. Mitchell self-link
hasJurisdiction Supreme Court of the United States
holding Congress may ban literacy tests in federal, state, and local elections
Congress may not require states to lower the voting age to 18 for state and local elections
Congress may regulate certain residency requirements for voting in federal elections
Congress may set the voting age at 18 for federal elections
influenced adoption of the Twenty-sixth Amendment
involvesLaw Civil Rights Act of 1964
Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970
Voting Rights Act of 1965
issue federal authority to set the voting age in federal elections
federal authority to set the voting age in state and local elections
federal regulation of literacy tests in elections
federal regulation of residency requirements for voting
joinedParty Arizona
surface form: State of Arizona

Idaho
surface form: State of Idaho

Texas
surface form: State of Texas
legalSubject election law
federalism
voting rights
locationOfCourt Washington, D.C.
opinionBy Hugo L. Black
surface form: Hugo Black
opinionType plurality opinion
plaintiff Oregon
surface form: State of Oregon
relatedTo Twenty-sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution
resultedIn split decision with no single majority opinion
separateOpinionBy Byron R. White
surface form: Byron White

Harry A. Blackmun
John M. Harlan II
Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Potter Stewart
Thurgood Marshall
Warren E. Burger
William J. Brennan Jr.
William O. Douglas
yearDecided 1970

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Oregon v. Mitchell fullCaseName Oregon v. Mitchell self-link