statuteInterpreted

P2241

predicate

Indicates that a legal authority (such as a court or agency) has provided an interpretation or authoritative reading of a particular statute.

Try in SPARQL

All labels observed (19)

Label	Occurrences
statuteInterpreted canonical	132
legalProvisionInterpreted	23
interpretsStatute	15
interpretsLawOf	11
hasStatuteInvolved	5
reviewsUnderStatute	5
interpretedStatute	3
interpretsLaw	3
interpretsLawIn	2
legalInstrumentInterpreted	2
reviewedStatute	2
authoritativeInterpreter	1
concernedStatute	1
decidedUnderStatute	1
interpretationAuthority	1
legalInterpretation	1
resultForStatute	1
statuteSectionInterpreted	1
upholdsStatute	1

Description generation (PDg)

The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.

Instruction

Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning.  
# Instructions
Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. 
# Response Format
Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'

Input

Predicate: statuteInterpreted

Generated description

Indicates that a legal authority (such as a court or agency) has provided an interpretation or authoritative reading of a particular statute.

Sample triples (211)

Subject	Object
Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961)	42 U.S.C. § 1983 via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" ⓘ
Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961)	Fourteenth Amendment via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" ⓘ surface form: Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961)	Due Process Clause via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" ⓘ surface form: Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978)	42 U.S.C. § 1983 ⓘ
West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988)	42 U.S.C. § 1983 via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" ⓘ
Will v. Michigan Department of State Police, 491 U.S. 58 (1989)	42 U.S.C. § 1983 ⓘ
Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225 (1972)	42 U.S.C. § 1983 ⓘ
Mitchum v. Foster, 407 U.S. 225 (1972)	Anti-Injunction Act ⓘ
City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 (1989) surface form: City of Canton v. Harris	42 U.S.C. § 1983 ⓘ
Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235 (1989)	42 U.S.C. § 1983 ⓘ
Judiciary of New Hampshire	New Hampshire via predicate surface "interpretsLawOf" ⓘ
courts of Belize	Belize via predicate surface "interpretsLawIn" ONNED1 ⓘ
Judiciary of New Jersey	New Jersey, United States via predicate surface "interpretsLawOf" ⓘ surface form: New Jersey
Article 11 of the Constitution of Japan	serves as a general clause supporting other specific rights provisions via predicate surface "legalInterpretation" ⓘ
Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs	Public Law 103-150 (Apology Resolution) NERFINISHED ⓘ
United States v. E. C. Knight Co.	Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 NERFINISHED ⓘ
Foster v. Love	2 U.S.C. § 7 via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" ⓘ
Foster v. Love	2 U.S.C. § 1 via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" ⓘ
Foster v. Love	Article I, Section 4 of the United States Constitution via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" NERFINISHED ⓘ
Eldred v. Ashcroft	Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act NERFINISHED ⓘ
Eldred v. Ashcroft	Copyright Act of 1976 NERFINISHED ⓘ
Jackson complained that the girls’ basketball team received unequal resources compared to the boys’ team surface form: Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education	Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 NERFINISHED ⓘ
Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.	Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act NERFINISHED ⓘ
Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.	CERCLA NERFINISHED ⓘ
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents	29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. ⓘ
Lane v. Peña	Rehabilitation Act of 1973 §504 NERFINISHED ⓘ
Lane v. Peña	Rehabilitation Act of 1973 §505(a)(2) NERFINISHED ⓘ
Sossamon v. Texas	Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act via predicate surface "interpretsStatute" NERFINISHED ⓘ
Sossamon v. Texas	42 U.S.C. § 2000cc via predicate surface "interpretsStatute" NERFINISHED ⓘ
Sossamon v. Texas	42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1 via predicate surface "interpretsStatute" ⓘ
Sossamon v. Texas	42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-2(a) via predicate surface "interpretsStatute" ⓘ
Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland	Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 252 NERFINISHED ⓘ
Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland	28 U.S.C. § 1331 ⓘ
Griffin v. Breckenridge	42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" ⓘ
Griffin v. Breckenridge	Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" NERFINISHED ⓘ
United States v. Skilling	18 U.S.C. § 1346 ⓘ
United States v. Skilling	federal mail fraud statute ⓘ
United States v. Skilling	federal wire fraud statute ⓘ
United States v. Arthur Andersen LLP	18 U.S.C. § 1512(b) ⓘ
United States v. Arthur Andersen LLP	federal witness tampering statute ⓘ
judiciary of Oxfordshire	Oxfordshire via predicate surface "interpretsLawIn" NERFINISHED ⓘ
United States v. Von's Grocery Co.	Clayton Act NERFINISHED ⓘ
United States v. Von's Grocery Co.	Section 7 of the Clayton Act NERFINISHED ⓘ
Albrecht v. Herald Co.	Sherman Antitrust Act NERFINISHED ⓘ
A. C. Jose v. Sivan Pillai	Representation of the People Act, 1951 NERFINISHED ⓘ
Basic Inc. v. Levinson	Securities Exchange Act of 1934 NERFINISHED ⓘ
Basic Inc. v. Levinson	Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 NERFINISHED ⓘ
Basic Inc. v. Levinson	SEC Rule 10b-5 NERFINISHED ⓘ
Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder	SEC Rule 10b-5 via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" NERFINISHED ⓘ
Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder	Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" NERFINISHED ⓘ