statuteInterpreted

P2241
predicate

Indicates that a legal authority (such as a court or agency) has provided an interpretation or authoritative reading of a particular statute.

All labels observed (19)

Label Occurrences
statuteInterpreted canonical 132
legalProvisionInterpreted 23
interpretsStatute 15

Description generation (PDg)

The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.

Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning.  
# Instructions
Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. 
# Response Format
Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: statuteInterpreted
Generated description
Indicates that a legal authority (such as a court or agency) has provided an interpretation or authoritative reading of a particular statute.

Sample triples (211)

Subject Object
Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores Rule 10b-5 via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" NERFINISHED
Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" NERFINISHED
SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 NERFINISHED
Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank Securities Exchange Act of 1934 NERFINISHED
Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 NERFINISHED
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 NERFINISHED
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta SEC Rule 10b-5 NERFINISHED
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld Authorization for Use of Military Force of 2001 NERFINISHED
Judicial Branch of Nebraska Nebraska via predicate surface "interpretsLawOf" NERFINISHED
United States v. Lara (2004)
surface form: United States v. Lara
25 U.S.C. § 1301(2) via predicate surface "interpretsStatute"
United States v. Lara (2004)
surface form: United States v. Lara
Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 via predicate surface "interpretsStatute" NERFINISHED
United States v. Lara (2004)
surface form: United States v. Lara
1990 amendments to the Indian Civil Rights Act via predicate surface "interpretsStatute"
Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins Rules of Decision Act NERFINISHED
Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 NERFINISHED
Runyon v. McCrary 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. 42 U.S.C. § 1982
Zarda
surface form: Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 NERFINISHED
Gonzales v. Carhart Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 via predicate surface "upholdsStatute" NERFINISHED
Gall v. United States 18 U.S.C. §3553(a)
Judiciary of Haiti Haitian law via predicate surface "interpretsLaw"
judiciary of Egypt Egypt via predicate surface "interpretsLawOf" NERFINISHED
Judicial Branch of Minnesota Minnesota via predicate surface "interpretsLawOf" NERFINISHED
North Carolina v. EPA Clean Air Act NERFINISHED
United Mine Workers v. Pennington Sherman Antitrust Act NERFINISHED
United Mine Workers v. Pennington Clayton Act NERFINISHED
Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada Unemployment Insurance Act NERFINISHED
Morrison v. Olson Ethics in Government Act of 1978 NERFINISHED
Morrison v. Olson Title VI of the Ethics in Government Act (independent counsel provisions) via predicate surface "statuteSectionInterpreted"
Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 NERFINISHED
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act NERFINISHED
United States v. Carolene Products Co. Filled Milk Act of 1923 NERFINISHED
Re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) Children Act 1989 NERFINISHED
Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp. Atomic Energy Act of 1954 NERFINISHED
Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp. Price-Anderson Act NERFINISHED
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" NERFINISHED
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts Confrontation Clause via predicate surface "legalProvisionInterpreted" NERFINISHED
Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 NERFINISHED
Judiciary of Kentucky Commonwealth of Kentucky via predicate surface "interpretsLawOf" NERFINISHED
Hensley v. Eckerhart 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 NERFINISHED
Marek v. Chesny 42 U.S.C. § 1988
National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Morgan Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 NERFINISHED
National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Morgan 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1)
United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association Sherman Antitrust Act NERFINISHED
United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association Sherman Act §1 NERFINISHED
the Lands case
surface form: Lands case
State-Owned Enterprises Act 1986 (New Zealand) NERFINISHED
SEC v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953) Securities Act of 1933 NERFINISHED
SEC v. Ralston Purina Co., 346 U.S. 119 (1953) Section 4(1) of the Securities Act of 1933
Harris v. McRae Hyde Amendment via predicate surface "hasStatuteInvolved" NERFINISHED
United States v. Turkette Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act NERFINISHED