Re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof)

E728346

Re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) is a leading House of Lords decision that clarified the civil standard of proof in child sexual abuse cases within English family law.

Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf House of Lords decision
United Kingdom case law
family law case
alsoKnownAs Re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1996] AC 563 NERFINISHED
areaOfLaw English family law
citation [1996] 1 All ER 1
[1996] 2 WLR 8
[1996] AC 563
citedBy Re B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) [2008] UKHL 35 NERFINISHED
Re U (Serious Injury: Standard of Proof); Re B [2004] EWCA Civ 567 NERFINISHED
country United Kingdom
court House of Lords NERFINISHED
holding the civil standard of proof in child protection cases is the balance of probabilities
the more serious the allegation, the stronger the evidence needed to satisfy the balance of probabilities
the seriousness of an allegation does not change the standard of proof
there is no intermediate standard of proof between the civil and criminal standards
impact clarified evidential approach in care proceedings involving sexual abuse allegations
influenced subsequent family law decisions on child protection
judge Lord Browne-Wilkinson NERFINISHED
Lord Lloyd of Berwick NERFINISHED
Lord Mustill NERFINISHED
Lord Slynn of Hadley NERFINISHED
jurisdiction England and Wales
language English
leadingJudge Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead NERFINISHED
legalIssue allegations of child sexual abuse
standard of proof in civil proceedings
threshold criteria under the Children Act 1989
legalPrinciple civil standard of proof applies in child protection cases
inherent probability of an event is a relevant consideration when evaluating evidence
no heightened standard of proof for serious allegations in civil cases
legalSystem common law
neutralCitation Re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1996] AC 563 NERFINISHED
parties children (minors)
father
local authority
mother
precedentStatus leading authority on standard of proof in family proceedings
standardOfProof balance of probabilities
statuteInterpreted Children Act 1989 NERFINISHED
subjectMatter alleged sexual abuse of children
care proceedings concerning minors
topic burden and standard of proof
child protection
evidence law
yearDecided 1996

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead notableWork Re H (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof)