Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada

E715441

Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada is a landmark 1979 Supreme Court of Canada decision that upheld a federal unemployment insurance scheme denying benefits to pregnant women, highlighting early limitations in Canadian equality rights protections.

Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (45)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Canadian constitutional law case
Supreme Court of Canada decision
equality rights case
areaOfLaw constitutional law
human rights law
social welfare law
characterization landmark early Canadian equality rights case
constitutionalProvisionConsidered Canadian Bill of Rights NERFINISHED
country Canada
court Supreme Court of Canada NERFINISHED
decisionDate 1979
defendant Attorney General of Canada NERFINISHED
discriminationGround pregnancy
sex
findingOnDiscrimination no violation of equality rights found
fullCaseName Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada NERFINISHED
governmentProgramChallenged federal unemployment insurance scheme
historicalContext pre-Charter Canadian rights framework
holding denial of benefits to pregnant women did not constitute sex discrimination under the Canadian Bill of Rights
federal unemployment insurance provisions denying benefits to certain pregnant women were valid
impact criticized as formalistic approach to equality
highlighted limitations of the Canadian Bill of Rights in protecting equality
influenced later development of equality jurisprudence under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
jurisdiction federal
languageOfProceedings English
legacy often cited as example of inadequate protection for women under early Canadian equality law
used in academic commentary to illustrate limitations of the Canadian Bill of Rights
legalIssue equality rights
pregnancy discrimination
sex discrimination
unemployment insurance benefits
outcome appeal dismissed
plaintiff Stella Bliss NERFINISHED
precedentialStatus important but later criticized precedent in equality jurisprudence
ratioDecidendi distinction based on pregnancy was not considered discrimination based on sex
relatedConcept formal equality
substantive equality
rightsInstrument Canadian Bill of Rights NERFINISHED
statuteInterpreted Unemployment Insurance Act NERFINISHED
subjectMatter eligibility for unemployment insurance benefits
treatment of pregnant women under social insurance schemes
subsequentTreatment approach to pregnancy discrimination later rejected by the Supreme Court of Canada
timePeriod late 1970s
typeOfDiscriminationAlleged exclusion of pregnant women from unemployment benefits
yearDecided 1979

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Canadian Bill of Rights notableCase Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada