Triple
T28170422
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada |
E715441
|
entity |
| Predicate | rightsInstrument |
P58382
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Canadian Bill of Rights |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Canadian Bill of Rights | Statement: [Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada, rightsInstrument, Canadian Bill of Rights]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rightsInstrument Context triple: [Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada, rightsInstrument, Canadian Bill of Rights]
-
A.
rights
Indicates that an entity possesses entitlements, permissions, or legal/moral claims in relation to another entity or context.
-
B.
rightsConcept
Indicates that there is a conceptual or definitional relationship involving rights, such as the idea, principle, or framework underlying specific rights.
-
C.
rightsEnforced
Indicates that legal or moral rights are actively upheld, protected, or compelled through appropriate mechanisms or actions.
-
D.
rightsCategory
Indicates the classification or type of rights associated with an entity or relationship.
-
E.
rightsRecognizedIn
chosen
Indicates that certain rights are formally acknowledged or upheld within a specified context, such as a legal system, jurisdiction, or document.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efd6b340f0819095680e15dcdc1830 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6562fd3488190be1acd8c526a28d2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f651a931748190a637e631a52bbfaa |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 10:12 p.m.