Albrecht v. Herald Co.

E530386

Albrecht v. Herald Co. is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that held maximum resale price maintenance to be per se illegal under the Sherman Act.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Sherman Act case
U.S. Supreme Court case
antitrust case
areaOfLaw antitrust law
competition law
category United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court
United States Supreme Court cases on antitrust law
citation 390 U.S. 145
citationStyle Albrecht v. Herald Co., 390 U.S. 145 (1968) NERFINISHED
concurrenceBy Potter Stewart NERFINISHED
William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1968-05-20
decisionMethod plenary review
decisionType majority decision
dissentBy Hugo L. Black NERFINISHED
John M. Harlan II NERFINISHED
Tom C. Clark NERFINISHED
docketNumber 51
fullName Albrecht v. Herald Co. NERFINISHED
holding Maximum resale price maintenance is per se illegal under §1 of the Sherman Act.
jurisdiction federal law
language English
laterTreatment Per se rule on maximum resale price maintenance rejected in State Oil Co. v. Khan.
legalIssue Sherman Act §1 NERFINISHED
maximum resale price maintenance
legalRule Agreements to fix maximum resale prices are per se violations of the Sherman Act.
majorityJoinedBy Abe Fortas NERFINISHED
Earl Warren NERFINISHED
Thurgood Marshall NERFINISHED
William O. Douglas NERFINISHED
majorityOpinionBy Byron R. White NERFINISHED
overruledBy State Oil Co. v. Khan NERFINISHED
overruledByYear 1997
page 145
petitioner Albrecht NERFINISHED
precedentialStatus overruled in part
reporter United States Reports
respondent Herald Co. NERFINISHED
result Judgment of the court of appeals reversed.
statuteInterpreted Sherman Antitrust Act NERFINISHED
subjectMatter newspaper distribution
vertical price restraints
volume 390
yearDecided 1968

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

The Antitrust Paradox criticizes Albrecht v. Herald Co.