Sossamon v. Texas

E494930

Sossamon v. Texas is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states do not consent to suits for money damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by accepting federal funds, reinforcing principles of state sovereign immunity.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act case
United States Supreme Court case
sovereign immunity case
appliesDoctrine clear statement rule for waivers of sovereign immunity
sovereign immunity
concerns religious exercise rights of institutionalized persons
remedies available against states under Spending Clause legislation
country United States of America
surface form: United States
decisionType 6-2 decision
hasArgumentDate 2010-11-02
hasCitation 131 S. Ct. 1651
179 L. Ed. 2d 700
563 U.S. 277
hasCourt Supreme Court of the United States NERFINISHED
hasDecisionDate 2011-04-20
hasDissentingOpinionBy Ruth Bader Ginsburg NERFINISHED
Stephen G. Breyer NERFINISHED
hasDocketNumber 08-1438
hasLegalIssue Congress’s power under the Spending Clause
availability of money damages under RLUIPA
state sovereign immunity
hasMajorityJustices Anthony M. Kennedy NERFINISHED
Antonin Scalia NERFINISHED
Elena Kagan NERFINISHED
John G. Roberts Jr. NERFINISHED
Samuel A. Alito Jr. NERFINISHED
Sonia Sotomayor NERFINISHED
hasPetitioner Harvey Leroy Sossamon III NERFINISHED
hasRespondent State of Texas NERFINISHED
Texas Department of Criminal Justice NERFINISHED
holds RLUIPA’s authorization of “appropriate relief” is not a clear waiver of state sovereign immunity to monetary damages
Spending Clause legislation must express any waiver of sovereign immunity unambiguously
States do not consent to suits for money damages under RLUIPA by accepting federal funds
interpretsStatute 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc NERFINISHED
42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1
42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-2(a)
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act NERFINISHED
legalArea constitutional law
federal statutory interpretation
majorityOpinionBy Clarence Thomas NERFINISHED
originatedFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit NERFINISHED
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas NERFINISHED
petitionerStatus state prisoner
result judgment of the Fifth Circuit affirmed
subjectMatter civil rights of prisoners
federal courts and jurisdiction
religious liberty
yearDecided 2011

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.