Triple
T20024063
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sossamon v. Texas |
E494930
|
entity |
| Predicate | petitionerStatus |
P121891
|
FINISHED |
| Object | state prisoner |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: state prisoner | Statement: [Sossamon v. Texas, petitionerStatus, state prisoner]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: petitionerStatus Context triple: [Sossamon v. Texas, petitionerStatus, state prisoner]
-
A.
petitioner
Indicates a relationship where one party formally requests a legal remedy or action from a court or authority.
-
B.
petitionerRole
Indicates the role or capacity in which a petitioner is acting within a legal or formal proceeding.
-
C.
respondentStatus
Indicates the current role, condition, or state of a respondent in relation to a survey, inquiry, or legal/administrative process.
-
D.
litigantStatus
chosen
Indicates the legal role or standing a party holds in a lawsuit or legal proceeding (e.g., plaintiff, defendant, appellant).
-
E.
defendantStatus
Indicates the legal condition or standing of a defendant within a judicial or law-enforcement process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626bfd288190aa5d65098b6433ae |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6628b6b7c81909a660fbec9c92295 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e54ce752748190a0a1ffddd0372271 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:35 p.m.