holding
P2237
predicate
Indicates that one entity is physically grasping, carrying, or keeping another entity in its possession or control.
Observed surface forms (1)
- keeps ×3
Sample triples (401)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| Obergefell v. Hodges | same-sex couples have a fundamental right to marry under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| Obergefell v. Hodges | states must license marriages between two people of the same sex ⓘ |
| Obergefell v. Hodges | states must recognize same-sex marriages lawfully performed out of state ⓘ |
| Ollie’s Barbecue case | Congress may apply Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to a local restaurant if its operations affect interstate commerce ⓘ |
| Ollie’s Barbecue case |
Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause
ⓘ
surface form:
Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a valid exercise of Congress’s Commerce Clause power as applied to Ollie’s Barbecue
|
| Ollie’s Barbecue case | racial discrimination in restaurants that purchase substantial food from interstate commerce can be regulated under the Commerce Clause ⓘ |
| Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. | Same-sex workplace harassment can constitute discrimination because of sex under Title VII. ⓘ |
| Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. | Title VII’s prohibition on sex discrimination applies to same-sex harassment when it is because of sex. ⓘ |
| Palko v. Connecticut | Only those rights that are of the very essence of a scheme of ordered liberty are incorporated against the states ⓘ |
| Palko v. Connecticut | The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment is not applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 | Public school districts may not assign students to schools solely for the purpose of achieving racial integration through explicit racial classifications ⓘ |
| Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 | The use of race as a tiebreaker in student assignment plans in Seattle and Louisville violated the Equal Protection Clause ⓘ |
| Paul v. Virginia | A corporation is not a citizen within the meaning of the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV of the U.S. Constitution. ⓘ |
| Paul v. Virginia | Issuing an insurance policy is not commerce within the meaning of the Commerce Clause. ⓘ |
| Paul v. Virginia | States may regulate and impose conditions on foreign insurance companies doing business within their borders. ⓘ |
| Polyphemus | flock of sheep via predicate surface "keeps" ⓘ |
| Polyphemus | goats via predicate surface "keeps" ⓘ |
| Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins | Employment decisions based on gender stereotyping violate Title VII ⓘ |
| Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins | In mixed-motive cases under Title VII, once a plaintiff shows that discrimination was a motivating factor, the burden shifts to the employer to prove it would have made the same decision absent the discriminatory motive ⓘ |
| Printz v. United States | Congress may not commandeer state or local executive officials to implement federal regulatory programs ⓘ |
| Printz v. United States | provisions of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act requiring state and local chief law enforcement officers to conduct background checks are unconstitutional ⓘ |
| Reed v. Reed | A law that prefers men over women as estate administrators violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| Reed v. Reed | Classifications based on sex must have a rational relationship to a legitimate state objective under the Equal Protection Clause ⓘ |
| Regents of the University of California v. Bakke | Allan Bakke must be admitted to the University of California, Davis School of Medicine ⓘ |
| Regents of the University of California v. Bakke | Race may be considered as one factor among many in university admissions ⓘ |
| Regents of the University of California v. Bakke | Rigid racial quotas in admissions violate the Equal Protection Clause ⓘ |
| Regents of the University of California v. Bakke | The specific special admissions program at UC Davis School of Medicine was unconstitutional ⓘ |
| Reynolds v. United States | Laws banning polygamy do not violate the Free Exercise Clause ⓘ |
| Reynolds v. United States | Religious duty is not a defense to a criminal indictment ⓘ |
| Reynolds v. United States | The Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws ⓘ |
| Reynolds v. United States | The Free Exercise Clause protects religious belief but not all religiously motivated conduct ⓘ |
| Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council |
National Environmental Policy Act
ⓘ
surface form:
NEPA does not require federal agencies to adopt any particular mitigation measures identified in an environmental impact statement
|
| Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council |
National Environmental Policy Act
ⓘ
surface form:
NEPA is essentially procedural and does not mandate particular substantive environmental results
|
| Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council | NEPA requires federal agencies to prepare a thorough environmental impact statement for major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment ⓘ |
| Romer v. Evans | A state cannot single out homosexual and bisexual persons and deny them protection across the board ⓘ |
| Romer v. Evans | Colorado Amendment 2 violates the Equal Protection Clause ⓘ |
| S.S. Wimbledon case | Germany was not entitled to refuse passage to the S.S. Wimbledon through the Kiel Canal ⓘ |
| S.S. Wimbledon case | treaty obligations limited Germany’s freedom to invoke neutrality to close the Kiel Canal ⓘ |
| Saenz v. Roe | California's durational residency requirement for full welfare benefits violates the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| Saenz v. Roe | states may not discriminate against new residents in the distribution of welfare benefits ⓘ |
| Saenz v. Roe | the right to travel includes the right of newly arrived citizens to be treated the same as longer-term citizens of a state ⓘ |
| San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez | Education is not a fundamental right under the U.S. Constitution ⓘ |
| San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez | Texas system of financing public education based on local property taxes does not violate the Equal Protection Clause ⓘ |
| San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez | Wealth is not a suspect classification under the Equal Protection Clause ⓘ |
| Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe | A school policy permitting student-led, student-initiated prayer at football games is unconstitutional ⓘ |
| Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe | Student-led, student-initiated prayer at public school football games violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment ⓘ |
| Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States | Congress unconstitutionally delegated legislative power to the President ⓘ |
| Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States |
National Industrial Recovery Act
ⓘ
surface form:
Title I of the National Industrial Recovery Act is unconstitutional
|
| Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States | the challenged activities were not in interstate commerce and had only an indirect effect on interstate commerce ⓘ |
| Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States | the federal government could not regulate the intrastate poultry business at issue under the Commerce Clause ⓘ |