Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC
E77393
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited courts’ ability to impose additional procedural requirements on federal agencies beyond those mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act and relevant statutes.
Aliases (1)
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
→
administrative law case → environmental law case → |
| areaOfLaw |
administrative procedure
→
environmental regulation → nuclear energy regulation → |
| citation |
435 U.S. 519
→
55 L. Ed. 2d 460 → 98 S. Ct. 1197 → |
| country |
United States
→
|
| court |
Supreme Court of the United States
→
|
| decisionDate |
1978-04-03
→
|
| holding |
Courts may not require agencies to use particular rulemaking procedures such as cross-examination or discovery absent statutory command
→
Reviewing courts may not impose additional procedural requirements on administrative agencies beyond those required by the Administrative Procedure Act or the agency’s organic statute or its own regulations → The Administrative Procedure Act establishes the maximum as well as the minimum procedural requirements for informal rulemaking unless Congress provides otherwise → |
| impact |
became a leading precedent in U.S. administrative law on agency procedures
→
limited judicial power to superimpose procedural requirements on agencies → reinforced the primacy of the Administrative Procedure Act in governing informal rulemaking procedures → |
| issue |
Whether a court of appeals may require an agency to employ additional rulemaking procedures beyond those specified in the APA and relevant statutes
→
|
| joinedBy |
Byron R. White
NERFINISHED
→
Harry A. Blackmun NERFINISHED → John Paul Stevens NERFINISHED → Lewis F. Powell Jr. NERFINISHED → Potter Stewart NERFINISHED → Thurgood Marshall → Warren E. Burger → William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED → |
| jurisdiction |
federal question jurisdiction
→
|
| languageOfOpinion |
English
→
|
| legalPrinciple |
courts cannot use their own notions of proper procedures to overturn agency rulemaking
→
judicial deference to agency procedural choices within statutory bounds → |
| lowerCourt |
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
→
|
| lowerCourtDecision |
D.C. Circuit imposed additional procedural requirements on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
→
|
| majorityOpinionBy |
William H. Rehnquist
→
|
| opinionType |
unanimous decision
→
|
| petitioner |
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation
→
|
| relatedCase |
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe
→
Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. → |
| relatedConcept |
hard look review
→
informal rulemaking → notice-and-comment rulemaking → |
| respondent |
Natural Resources Defense Council
→
other environmental groups → |
| result |
Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit
→
|
| statuteInterpreted |
Administrative Procedure Act
→
Atomic Energy Act → |
| subjectMatter |
Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing procedures for nuclear power plants
→
|
| term |
1977 Term
→
|
Referenced by (2)
| Subject (surface form when different) | Predicate |
|---|---|
|
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC
("D.C. Circuit imposed additional procedural requirements on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission")
→
|
lowerCourtDecision |
|
National Environmental Policy Act
→
|
relatedCaseLaw |