Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC decision | Statement: [Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit, isOutcomeOf, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC decision]

Target entity: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC decision
Context triple: [Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit, isOutcomeOf, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC decision]

• A. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC chosen
  Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited courts’ ability to impose additional procedural requirements on federal agencies beyond those mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act and relevant statutes.
• B. Calvert Cliffs Coordinating Committee v. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission
  Calvert Cliffs Coordinating Committee v. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission is a landmark 1971 federal court decision that gave strong judicial force to the National Environmental Policy Act by requiring agencies to rigorously consider environmental impacts in their decision-making.
• C. D.C. Circuit in NRDC v. NRC
  D.C. Circuit in NRDC v. NRC is a federal appellate court decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in an environmental regulatory case involving the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
• D. Alden v. Maine
  Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
• E. Kelo v. City of New London
  Kelo v. City of New London is a landmark 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that expanded the interpretation of “public use” under the Takings Clause to allow government seizure of private property for economic development projects.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: isOutcomeOf
Context triple: [Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit, isOutcomeOf, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC decision]

• A. outcomeOf chosen
  Indicates that one entity is the result, consequence, or product that arises from another entity, event, or process.
• B. describesOutcomeOf
  Indicates that one entity specifies or characterizes the result, consequence, or outcome produced by another entity or process.
• C. associatedWithOutcome
  Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, contributes to, or results in a particular outcome.
• D. outcomeType
  Indicates the specific category or nature of the result produced by an event, process, or action.
• E. initialOutcome
  Indicates the result or state that first occurs at the beginning of a process, event, or interaction, before any subsequent changes or outcomes.
• F. None of above.