Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe

E137684

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited federal agencies’ discretion in approving highway construction through public parks and strengthened judicial review of administrative decisions.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe canonical 2

Statements (47)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
landmark administrative law case
clarifiesConcept limits on post hoc rationalizations by agencies
requirement for contemporaneous administrative record
scope of judicial review of informal agency action
concernsStatute Section 138 of Title 23 of the United States Code
Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966
hasChiefJustice Warren E. Burger
hasCitation 401 U.S. 402
hasConcurrenceAuthor Byron R. White
Harry A. Blackmun
Hugo L. Black
Potter Stewart
William J. Brennan Jr.
William O. Douglas
hasCountry United States of America
surface form: United States
hasCourt Supreme Court of the United States
hasDecision judgment of the Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded
hasDecisionDate 1971-03-02
hasDissentAuthor Harry A. Blackmun
John M. Harlan II
Warren E. Burger
hasDocketNumber No. 89
hasHolding administrative decisions are subject to judicial review under the arbitrary and capricious standard
federal courts may review the Secretary of Transportation’s decision to route a highway through a public park
the Secretary of Transportation must show that there are no feasible and prudent alternatives to using parkland for highway construction
hasImpact became a foundational precedent in U.S. administrative law
influenced later environmental and transportation planning litigation
limited federal agencies’ discretion in approving highways through public parks
strengthened judicial oversight of administrative agencies
hasLegalArea administrative law
environmental law
transportation law
hasMajorityAuthor Thurgood Marshall
hasPetitioner Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc.
hasProceduralHistory review of a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
hasRespondent John A. Volpe
hasRespondentRole United States Secretary of Transportation
hasStandardOfReview arbitrary and capricious
hard look review
involvesCity Memphis, Tennessee, United States
surface form: Memphis, Tennessee
involvesIssue construction of Interstate 40 through a public park
involvesLocation Overton Park
involvesPartyType citizen environmental group
federal transportation officials
isTaughtIn U.S. law school administrative law courses
U.S. law school environmental law courses

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Overton Park notableEvent Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC relatedCase Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe