Triple

T15658802
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation E376516 entity
Predicate partyToCase P15954 FINISHED
Object Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC E77393 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC | Statement: [Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation, partyToCase, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC
Context triple: [Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation, partyToCase, Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC]
  • A. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC chosen
    Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited courts’ ability to impose additional procedural requirements on federal agencies beyond those mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act and relevant statutes.
  • B. Calvert Cliffs Coordinating Committee v. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission
    Calvert Cliffs Coordinating Committee v. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission is a landmark 1971 federal court decision that gave strong judicial force to the National Environmental Policy Act by requiring agencies to rigorously consider environmental impacts in their decision-making.
  • C. United States v. Darby
    United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
  • D. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority
    Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority is a landmark 1936 U.S. Supreme Court decision best known for Justice Brandeis’s articulation of the “Ashwander rules,” which limit the Court’s exercise of judicial review and emphasize constitutional avoidance.
  • E. Alden v. Maine
    Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85cd1564c8190991adda63bfab4b0 completed April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e04ef3cb8c8190a10815b675b341c1 completed April 16, 2026, 2:52 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ff679bb7f0819092a98c2981bc9267 completed May 9, 2026, 4:58 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:15 a.m.