McCulloch v. Maryland

E4582

McCulloch v. Maryland is an 1819 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed federal supremacy over the states and upheld the implied powers of Congress under the Constitution.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (2)

Statements (47)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
constitutional law case
landmark case
areaOfLaw constitutional law
federalism
separation of powers
chiefJusticeAtTime John Marshall
citation 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Necessary and Proper Clause
Supremacy Clause
Taxing and Spending Clause
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
dateDecided 1819-03-06
decision in favor of McCulloch and the federal government
decisionType unanimous decision
defendant Maryland
surface form: State of Maryland
establishedDoctrine that the Constitution is intended to endure for ages and must be adapted to various crises of human affairs
that the power to tax involves the power to destroy
federalEntityInvolved Second Bank of the United States
fullCaseName McCulloch v. Maryland self-linksurface differs
surface form: McCulloch v. The State of Maryland
holding Congress has implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause to create a national bank
federal law is supreme over conflicting state law
the State of Maryland may not tax instruments of the national government
impact became a foundational precedent for federalism in the United States
provided broad interpretation of congressional powers
strengthened the authority of the federal government over the states
issue constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States
whether a state may tax a federal institution
jurisdiction United States of America
surface form: United States
languageOfProceedings English
legalPrinciple broad construction of the Necessary and Proper Clause
federal supremacy
implied powers doctrine
locationOfOriginatingDispute Maryland
surface form: State of Maryland
majorityOpinionBy John Marshall
partyRoleOfJamesMcCulloch cashier of the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States
plaintiff James McCulloch
precedentFor broad federal regulatory power
later Commerce Clause jurisprudence
reinforcedClause Necessary and Proper Clause
surface form: Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8

Supremacy Clause
surface form: Supremacy Clause of Article VI of the U.S. Constitution
result Maryland tax on the Bank of the United States held unconstitutional
stateParty Maryland
topic limits on state taxation of federal entities
scope of congressional power
yearDecided 1819

Referenced by (17)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Supremacy Clause interpretedInCase McCulloch v. Maryland
Necessary and Proper Clause majorCase McCulloch v. Maryland
McCulloch v. Maryland fullCaseName McCulloch v. Maryland self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: McCulloch v. The State of Maryland
Early Republic of the United States hasPart McCulloch v. Maryland
John Marshall notableWork McCulloch v. Maryland
James McCulloch participantIn McCulloch v. Maryland
James McCulloch hasNameInCaseTitle McCulloch v. Maryland
Era of Good Feelings significantEvent McCulloch v. Maryland
Marshall Court era hasKeyDecision McCulloch v. Maryland
John Marshall Court landmarkCase McCulloch v. Maryland
United States Supreme Court cases hasPart McCulloch v. Maryland
Marshall Court significantCase McCulloch v. Maryland