decidedIn

P29537
predicate

Indicates that a decision, ruling, or outcome was made within a particular case, proceeding, or deliberative context.

All labels observed (8)

Label Occurrences
decidedIn canonical 23
wasDecidedOn 6
finalDecidedIn 2

Description generation (PDg)

The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.

Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning.  
# Instructions
Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. 
# Response Format
Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: decidedIn
Generated description
Indicates that a decision, ruling, or outcome was made within a particular case, proceeding, or deliberative context.

Sample triples (37)

Subject Object
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission October Term 2009
2009 Oregon–Oregon State football game regulation
1996 MLS Cup extra time
Standard Oil antitrust case Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States via predicate surface "dissolutionDecision"
surface form: Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States
Temple Lot Case 1894
Grove City College v. Bell February 28, 1984 via predicate surface "wasDecidedOn"
2021 NWSL Championship extra time
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union October Term 1988
FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. 2000
France vs Croatia
surface form: France vs Croatia (2018 FIFA World Cup Final)
regular time
United States, Petitioner v. Antonio J. Morrison et al.
surface form: United States v. Morrison
October Term 1999
Rostker v. Goldberg Washington, D.C.
Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. 1955-03-28 via predicate surface "wasDecidedOn"
United States v. Giordano June 17, 1974 via predicate surface "wasDecidedOn"
Gelbard v. United States October Term 1971
United States v. Warshak yes via predicate surface "panelDecision"
Boerne, Texas
surface form: City of Boerne v. Flores
1997
Maryland v. King October Term 2012
The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment.
surface form: The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) via predicate surface "decidedInCase"
surface form: Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
MLS Cup 2010 extra time
Rocky Mountain Cup single MLS regular season via predicate surface "decidedWithin"
Buckley v. Valeo 1976
Payton v. New York October Term 1979
United States v. Sokolow 1989
Brown Shoe Co. v. United States 1962-06-25 via predicate surface "wasDecidedOn"
1995 American League Division Series Game 5 extra innings
2006 FIFA World Cup semi-final vs Germany extra time
Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society United Kingdom House of Lords NERFINISHED
Sovereignty over Pedra Branca case sovereignty awarded to Singapore via predicate surface "decisionOnPedraBranca"
NCAA Division I men's ice hockey national championship (1991)
surface form: 1991 NCAA Division I men's ice hockey national championship
overtime via predicate surface "finalDecidedIn"
United States v. Gementera yes via predicate surface "panelDecision"
Morrison v. Olson October Term 1987
United States v. Carolene Products Co. 1938-04-25 via predicate surface "wasDecidedOn"
Wong Sun v. United States 1963-01-14 via predicate surface "wasDecidedOn"
United States v. Dennett 1930
1999 NCAA Division I Men's Ice Hockey Championship overtime via predicate surface "finalDecidedIn"
1980 FA Cup Final normal time