United States v. Sokolow

E522187

United States v. Sokolow is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the standard for reasonable suspicion under the Fourth Amendment, particularly in the context of drug courier profiling and investigative stops.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf U.S. Supreme Court case
criminal procedure case
search and seizure case
appliedTest totality of the circumstances
areaOfLaw United States constitutional law
United States criminal procedure
arguedDate 1988-10-31
chiefJusticeAtDecision William H. Rehnquist NERFINISHED
citation 490 U.S. 1
citedFor definition of reasonable suspicion
use of profiles in investigative stops
concurrenceBy Harry A. Blackmun NERFINISHED
Thurgood Marshall NERFINISHED
constitutionalProvision Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
court Supreme Court of the United States
decidedIn 1989
decisionDate 1989-04-03
dissentBy John Paul Stevens NERFINISHED
William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED
docketNumber 87-1295
factPattern Investigatory stop of a suspected drug courier at an airport based on multiple suspicious travel characteristics.
fullName United States v. Sokolow NERFINISHED
holding Officers may have reasonable suspicion to justify an investigative stop based on the totality of the circumstances even when each individual factor is consistent with innocent travel.
Use of a drug courier profile does not, by itself, render a stop unconstitutional if reasonable suspicion exists under the totality of the circumstances.
involves airport stop
drug enforcement investigation
joinedByInMajority Anthony M. Kennedy NERFINISHED
Antonin Scalia NERFINISHED
Byron R. White NERFINISHED
John Paul Stevens NERFINISHED
Sandra Day O’Connor NERFINISHED
jurisdiction United States of America
surface form: United States
legalIssue Fourth Amendment NERFINISHED
Terry stop
drug courier profile
investigative stop
reasonable suspicion standard
majorityOpinionBy William H. Rehnquist NERFINISHED
page 1
petitioner United States NERFINISHED
precedentialStatus binding precedent in U.S. federal courts
relatedDoctrine Terry v. Ohio NERFINISHED
reporter United States Reports
respondent Andrew Sokolow NERFINISHED
standardClarified reasonable suspicion
topic criminal procedure
search and seizure law
volume 490

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Terry v. Ohio subsequentCitationBy United States v. Sokolow