Grove City College v. Bell
E108700
Grove City College v. Bell is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly narrowed the scope of Title IX’s application to only those specific programs directly receiving federal funds, prompting later legislative action to restore broader coverage.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Grove City College v. Bell canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T913281 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Grove City College v. Bell Context triple: [Title IX, notableCase, Grove City College v. Bell]
-
A.
Lee v. Weisman
Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
-
B.
Dartmouth College v. Woodward
Dartmouth College v. Woodward is an 1819 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the protection of corporate charters as contracts under the Constitution, limiting states’ power to alter them.
-
C.
Gratz v. Bollinger
Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
-
D.
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case that held student-led, student-initiated prayer at public school football games unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
-
E.
County of Allegheny v. ACLU
County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Grove City College v. Bell Target entity description: Grove City College v. Bell is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly narrowed the scope of Title IX’s application to only those specific programs directly receiving federal funds, prompting later legislative action to restore broader coverage.
-
A.
Lee v. Weisman
Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
-
B.
Dartmouth College v. Woodward
Dartmouth College v. Woodward is an 1819 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the protection of corporate charters as contracts under the Constitution, limiting states’ power to alter them.
-
C.
Gratz v. Bollinger
Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
-
D.
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case that held student-led, student-initiated prayer at public school football games unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
-
E.
County of Allegheny v. ACLU
County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (40)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Title IX case
ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ landmark education law case ⓘ |
| appliesTo | educational institutions receiving federal student aid ⓘ |
| citedBy | later Title IX and federal funding discrimination cases ⓘ |
| concernsAgency | United States Department of Education ⓘ |
| concernsIssue |
federal financial assistance to educational institutions
ⓘ
program-specific versus institution-wide application of Title IX ⓘ scope of Title IX coverage ⓘ |
| concernsRegulation | federal nondiscrimination regulations under Title IX ⓘ |
| concernsRight | prohibition of sex discrimination in education programs receiving federal funds ⓘ |
| concernsStatute |
Title IX
ⓘ
surface form:
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972
|
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| effect |
limited federal nondiscrimination requirements to particular funded programs rather than entire institutions
ⓘ
narrowed the scope of Title IX coverage ⓘ |
| hasCitation | 465 U.S. 555 ⓘ |
| hasCourt | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| hasDocketNumber | No. 82-792 ⓘ |
| hasPetitioner | Grove City College ⓘ |
| hasRespondent | Terrel H. Bell, Secretary of Education ⓘ |
| held |
Title IX applies only to specific programs or activities directly receiving federal financial assistance
ⓘ
federal student grants to students can constitute federal assistance to the college program they support ⓘ |
| historicalSignificance | triggered legislative expansion of civil rights coverage in federally funded institutions ⓘ |
| influenced | interpretation of other federal civil rights statutes tied to federal funding ⓘ |
| involvesParty | a private, church-related liberal arts college in Pennsylvania ⓘ |
| isRelatedCase | Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 legislative history ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | federal question jurisdiction ⓘ |
| languageOfProceedings | English ⓘ |
| ledTo | Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 ⓘ |
| legalArea |
administrative law
ⓘ
civil rights law ⓘ education law ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy |
Byron R. White
ⓘ
surface form:
Justice Byron R. White
|
| postDecisionDevelopment | Congress broadened coverage so that if any part of an institution receives federal funds, the whole institution is covered by civil rights laws ⓘ |
| precedentFor | program-specific interpretation of “federal financial assistance” ⓘ |
| prompted | congressional response to restore broader civil rights coverage ⓘ |
| timePeriod |
Burger Court
ⓘ
surface form:
Burger Court era
|
| vote | 7–2 decision ⓘ |
| wasArguedOn | November 29, 1983 ⓘ |
| wasDecidedOn | February 28, 1984 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Grove City College v. Bell Description of subject: Grove City College v. Bell is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly narrowed the scope of Title IX’s application to only those specific programs directly receiving federal funds, prompting later legislative action to restore broader coverage.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.