Triple
T16599030
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment |
E403283
|
entity |
| Predicate | decidedInCase |
P29537
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association |
E85755
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association | Statement: [The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment, decidedInCase, Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association Context triple: [The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment, decidedInCase, Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association]
-
A.
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018)
chosen
Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down the federal ban on state-authorized sports gambling, significantly expanding states’ rights under the anti-commandeering doctrine.
-
B.
Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
Christie v. National Collegiate Athletic Association was an earlier federal court case in New Jersey challenging the constitutionality of federal restrictions on state-authorized sports betting, which set the stage for the later Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. NCAA.
-
C.
Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Brzonkala v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University was a federal civil rights case in which a former Virginia Tech student sued her alleged rapists and the university under the Violence Against Women Act, setting the stage for the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Morrison on the limits of Congress’s Commerce Clause power.
-
D.
NCAA Division I Committee on Legislative Relief
The NCAA Division I Committee on Legislative Relief is a body that reviews and decides on requests for exceptions or waivers to NCAA Division I rules in special or extenuating circumstances.
-
E.
NCAA Division I Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sports
The NCAA Division I Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sports is a governance body that develops and oversees policies to protect student-athlete health, safety, and well-being in collegiate sports.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: decidedInCase Context triple: [The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment, decidedInCase, Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association]
-
A.
decidedIn
chosen
Indicates that a decision, ruling, or outcome was made within a particular case, proceeding, or deliberative context.
-
B.
caseDecidedBy
Indicates that a legal case is resolved or adjudicated by a specific decision-making authority, such as a judge or court.
-
C.
decidedWith
Indicates that an entity made a decision jointly or in agreement with another entity.
-
D.
decidesOn
Indicates that an agent makes a choice or determination regarding a particular option, issue, or course of action.
-
E.
decisionHolding
Indicates that an entity has made, issued, or is responsible for a particular formal decision or ruling.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d883880d0c81908b5fcd454e767b60 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:58 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e35d74738c81909711654cf38af150 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 10:31 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00aae920588190b2a6b03ab1100346 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e296aabc508190b3836a91b49113ad |
completed | April 17, 2026, 8:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:16 a.m.