Wong Sun v. United States

E809985

Wong Sun v. United States is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the exclusionary rule by establishing the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine and clarifying when evidence obtained after an illegal search or arrest must be suppressed.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Wong Sun v. United States canonical 4

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
criminal procedure case
landmark decision
appliedAmendment Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution NERFINISHED
clarified application of the exclusionary rule to derivative evidence
when evidence obtained after an illegal search or arrest must be suppressed
hasChiefJusticeAtDecision Earl Warren NERFINISHED
hasCitation 371 U.S. 471
hasCountry United States of America
surface form: United States
hasCourt Supreme Court of the United States NERFINISHED
hasDocketNumber No. 36
hasImpactOn United States criminal procedure NERFINISHED
police investigative practices
suppression of evidence in federal courts
hasJurisdiction federal criminal prosecution
hasLanguage English opinion
hasLegalDoctrine attenuation doctrine
exclusionary rule
fruit of the poisonous tree
hasMajorityOpinionBy William J. Brennan Jr. NERFINISHED
hasPetitioner Wong Sun NERFINISHED
hasRespondent United States NERFINISHED
hasSubjectMatter narcotics offenses
hasVote 5–4
hasYear 1963
held a confession may be admissible if obtained after the taint of an illegal arrest has been sufficiently attenuated
not all evidence is fruit of the poisonous tree simply because it would not have come to light but for illegal actions of the police
verbal evidence and narcotics obtained as a result of unlawful arrests were inadmissible as fruits of the poisonous tree
involvesIssue Fourth Amendment search and seizure
admissibility of confessions
attenuation doctrine
exclusionary rule
fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine
illegal arrest
tainted evidence
involvesParty United States NERFINISHED
Wong Sun NERFINISHED
isCitedFor definition of fruits of the poisonous tree
limits on admissibility of statements following illegal arrests
standards for attenuation of taint
isPartOf Warren Court jurisprudence
originatedFrom United States District Court for the Northern District of California NERFINISHED
wasArguedOn 1962-10-09
wasDecidedOn 1963-01-14
wasRearguedOn 1962-10-10

Referenced by (4)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Utah v. Strieff (dissent on Fourth Amendment rights) relatedCase Wong Sun v. United States
subject surface form: Utah v. Strieff
Oregon v. Elstad distinguishedFrom Wong Sun v. United States
Michigan v. Tucker hasPrecedent Wong Sun v. United States
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States precedentFor Wong Sun v. United States