Miranda v. Arizona

E8268
United States Supreme Court case constitutional law case criminal procedure case landmark decision

Miranda v. Arizona is a landmark 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the requirement for police to inform criminal suspects of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during custodial interrogations.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (9)

Label Occurrences
Miranda v. Arizona canonical 22
Miranda warnings 6
Miranda rights 3

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
constitutional law case ⓘ
criminal procedure case ⓘ
landmark decision ⓘ
appliesTo custodial interrogation ⓘ
police questioning of suspects in custody ⓘ
areaOfLaw constitutional criminal procedure ⓘ
criminal procedure ⓘ
citation 384 U.S. 436 ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
surface form: U.S. Constitution, Fifth Amendment

Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ
surface form: U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment

U.S. Constitution, Sixth Amendment ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
createdDoctrine Miranda v. Arizona self-linksurface differs ⓘ
surface form: Miranda rights

Miranda v. Arizona self-linksurface differs ⓘ
surface form: Miranda warnings
decisionDate 1966-06-13 ⓘ
effect Established nationwide requirement for Miranda warnings by law enforcement ⓘ
Made unwarned custodial statements generally inadmissible in the prosecution’s case-in-chief ⓘ
fullName Miranda v. Arizona self-linksurface differs ⓘ
surface form: Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
geographicScope all U.S. states and territories ⓘ
holding If a suspect indicates in any manner that they wish to remain silent, interrogation must cease. ⓘ
If a suspect requests an attorney, interrogation must cease until an attorney is present. ⓘ
Prosecution may not use statements stemming from custodial interrogation of a defendant unless procedural safeguards are used to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. ⓘ
Suspects in custody must be informed of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney before interrogation. ⓘ
jurisdiction United States of America ⓘ
surface form: United States
legalIssue Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination ⓘ
Sixth Amendment right to counsel ⓘ
admissibility of custodial confessions ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy Earl Warren ⓘ
surface form: Chief Justice Earl Warren
majorityVote 5-4 ⓘ
namedAfter Ernesto Arturo Miranda ⓘ
surface form: Ernesto Miranda
overruledBy none ⓘ
petitioner Ernesto Arturo Miranda ⓘ
relatedCase Dickerson v. United States ⓘ
Escobedo v. Illinois ⓘ
requiredWarning Anything said can and will be used against the suspect in court ⓘ
If the suspect cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed before questioning if desired ⓘ
Right to consult with an attorney and to have the attorney present during questioning ⓘ
Right to remain silent ⓘ
requires voluntary, knowing, and intelligent waiver of rights before questioning ⓘ
respondent U.S. state of Arizona ⓘ
surface form: State of Arizona
standardOfWaiver knowing and intelligent ⓘ
voluntary ⓘ
stateOfOrigin Arizona ⓘ
status good law as of 2024 ⓘ
subjectMatter police interrogation practices ⓘ
rights of criminal suspects ⓘ
yearDecided 1966 ⓘ

Referenced by (38)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

American Civil Liberties Union → notableCase → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment → keyCase → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
subject surface form: Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Miranda v. Arizona → fullName → Miranda v. Arizona self-linksurface differs ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
Miranda v. Arizona → createdDoctrine → Miranda v. Arizona self-linksurface differs ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda warnings
Miranda v. Arizona → createdDoctrine → Miranda v. Arizona self-linksurface differs ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda rights
Due Process Clause → interpretedInCase → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
Earl Warren → notableWork → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda v. Arizona decision
Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution → legalConcept → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda rights
Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution → influencedDecision → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
Ernesto Arturo Miranda → hasLegalCase → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
Ernesto Arturo Miranda → associatedLegalDoctrine → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda warning
Ernesto Arturo Miranda → associatedLegalDoctrine → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda rights
Escobedo v. Illinois → relatedCase → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
Escobedo v. Illinois → precedentFor → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda warnings doctrine
Dickerson v. United States → relatedCase → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court → hasNotableCase → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
dissenting opinion in Miranda v. Arizona → partOf → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
dissenting opinion in Miranda v. Arizona → caseCitation → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
dissenting opinion in Miranda v. Arizona → relatedTo → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda warnings
Malloy v. Hogan → relatedCase → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
Arizona State Prison → associatedCourtCase → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
City of Mesa Cemetery → notableFor → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
subject surface form: Ernesto Arturo Miranda
Massiah v. United States → relatedTo → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
Charles Thomas Dickerson → legalIssueInvolved → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda warnings
Charles Thomas Dickerson → involvedInLegalDoctrine → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda v. Arizona precedent
New York v. Quarles → relatedDoctrine → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
Oregon v. Elstad → constitutionalProvision → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda v. Arizona doctrine
Oregon v. Elstad → distinguishedFrom → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
Oregon v. Elstad → keyConcept → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda warnings
Michigan v. Tucker → appliesDoctrine → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda warnings
Michigan v. Tucker → clarifies → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
Michigan v. Tucker → distinguishes → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
Michigan v. Tucker → hasPrecedent → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
Danny Escobedo → relatedTo → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
subject surface form: Escobedo v. Illinois
book "Gideon's Trumpet" by Anthony Lewis → relatedTo → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
subject surface form: Gideon's Trumpet
United States Supreme Court cases → hasPart → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
Warren Court era → notableCase → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
Warren Court era → notableDoctrine → Miranda v. Arizona ⓘ
this entity surface form: Miranda warnings