Triple
T1213131
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution |
E26047
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalConcept |
P10240
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Miranda rights |
E8268
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Miranda rights | Statement: [Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, legalConcept, Miranda rights]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Miranda rights Context triple: [Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, legalConcept, Miranda rights]
-
A.
Miranda v. Arizona
chosen
Miranda v. Arizona is a landmark 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the requirement for police to inform criminal suspects of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during custodial interrogations.
-
B.
Smith Act
The Smith Act is a 1940 U.S. federal law that criminalized advocating the violent overthrow of the government and was widely used during the early Cold War to prosecute suspected communists.
-
C.
U.S. Constitution, Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees criminal defendants rights such as a speedy and public trial, an impartial jury, notice of accusations, confrontation of witnesses, compulsory process for obtaining witnesses, and the assistance of counsel.
-
D.
Mapp v. Ohio
Mapp v. Ohio is a landmark 1961 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the exclusionary rule to the states, holding that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in state criminal prosecutions.
-
E.
Betts v. Brady
Betts v. Brady was a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held indigent defendants in state criminal cases were not automatically entitled to court-appointed counsel, a rule later overturned by Gideon v. Wainwright.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4948331fc8190b531ac9bec71c491 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bde6cb608190b77fc5c47083e4b7 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:29 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ac7f43a12c8190a1ba90eefafd6bbc |
completed | March 7, 2026, 7:40 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:46 p.m.