Triple

T2128645
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Escobedo v. Illinois E46482 entity
Predicate precedentFor P3138 FINISHED
Object Miranda warnings doctrine E8268 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Miranda warnings doctrine | Statement: [Escobedo v. Illinois, precedentFor, Miranda warnings doctrine]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Miranda warnings doctrine
Context triple: [Escobedo v. Illinois, precedentFor, Miranda warnings doctrine]
  • A. Miranda v. Arizona chosen
    Miranda v. Arizona is a landmark 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the requirement for police to inform criminal suspects of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during custodial interrogations.
  • B. New York v. Quarles
    New York v. Quarles is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that created the "public safety" exception to the Miranda warning requirement, allowing certain unwarned statements to be admitted when needed to protect public safety.
  • C. Mapp v. Ohio
    Mapp v. Ohio is a landmark 1961 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the exclusionary rule to the states, holding that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in state criminal prosecutions.
  • D. United States v. Leon
    United States v. Leon is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the "good faith" exception to the exclusionary rule in Fourth Amendment search and seizure cases.
  • E. Illinois v. Gates
    Illinois v. Gates is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the "totality of the circumstances" test for determining whether an informant’s tip provides probable cause for issuing a search warrant.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88a1626548190ae59a5028c3baa8e completed March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abbb7659f48190871cb27faf47e18a completed March 7, 2026, 5:45 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ae5d8e61d48190af0becdc5a040cd9 completed March 9, 2026, 5:41 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:44 p.m.