United States v. Kagama

E330551

United States v. Kagama is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority over crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations, reinforcing congressional power in Indian affairs.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (3)

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf U.S. Supreme Court case
federal Indian law case
affects criminal jurisdiction in Indian Country
tribal sovereignty
concerns crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations
federal-tribal relations
limits of tribal sovereignty
hasCitation 118 U.S. 375
hasCountry United States of America
hasCourt Supreme Court of the United States
hasDecisionDate 1886-05-10
hasDefendant Kagama
hasFullCitation United States v. Kagama self-linksurface differs
surface form: United States v. Kagama, 118 U.S. 375 (1886)
hasJurisdiction federal
hasJustice Horace Gray
John Marshall Harlan
Joseph P. Bradley
Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite
surface form: Morrison Waite

Samuel Blatchford
Samuel Freeman Miller
Stanley Matthews
Stephen Johnson Field
William Burnham Woods
hasKeyDoctrine guardian-ward theory of federal-tribal relations
plenary power doctrine
hasLanguage English
hasLegalArea constitutional law
criminal law
federal Indian law
hasOpinionAuthor Samuel Freeman Miller
hasPage 375
hasPlaintiff United States of America
surface form: United States
hasReporter United States Reports
hasSubject Major Crimes Act
congressional power over Indian affairs
federal jurisdiction over crimes in Indian Country
hasTypeOfParty Native American defendant
federal government as plaintiff
hasVolume 118
hasYear 1886
held Congress has authority to exercise criminal jurisdiction over certain major crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations
Major Crimes Act
surface form: the Major Crimes Act is constitutional
interprets United States Constitution
surface form: U.S. Constitution

scope of congressional power over Indian tribes
isLocatedInReporter United States Reports
surface form: United States Reports, volume 118
precededBy Ex parte Crow Dog
reinforced plenary power of Congress over Indian affairs
upheldStatute Major Crimes Act of 1885

How these facts were elicited

The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.

Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10.

# Requirements
- If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list.
- If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list.
- Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf".
- Do not get too wordy.
- Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: United States v. Kagama
Description of subject: United States v. Kagama is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority over crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations, reinforcing congressional power in Indian affairs.

Referenced by (4)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite presidedOver United States v. Kagama
subject surface form: Morrison R. Waite
Native American sovereignty historicallyArticulatedIn United States v. Kagama
this entity surface form: United States v. Kagama (1886)
United States federal Indian law and policy shapedBy United States v. Kagama
United States v. Kagama hasFullCitation United States v. Kagama self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: United States v. Kagama, 118 U.S. 375 (1886)