Triple
T12127356
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States federal Indian law and policy |
E288841
|
entity |
| Predicate | shapedBy |
P2454
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States v. Kagama |
E330551
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Kagama | Statement: [United States federal Indian law and policy, shapedBy, United States v. Kagama]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Kagama Context triple: [United States federal Indian law and policy, shapedBy, United States v. Kagama]
-
A.
United States v. Kagama
chosen
United States v. Kagama is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority over crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations, reinforcing congressional power in Indian affairs.
-
B.
Yasui v. United States
Yasui v. United States was a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime conviction of Minoru Yasui for violating a military-imposed curfew on Japanese Americans, thereby affirming the government’s authority to restrict their civil liberties during World War II.
-
C.
Missouri v. Holland
Missouri v. Holland is a landmark 1920 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the federal government’s power to implement international treaties through national legislation even in areas traditionally regulated by the states.
-
D.
Fong Yue Ting v. United States
Fong Yue Ting v. United States is an 1893 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld broad federal authority over immigration, affirming the government's power to deport non-citizens without full constitutional protections.
-
E.
Ex parte Milligan
Ex parte Milligan is an 1866 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the use of military tribunals for civilians when civil courts are open, reinforcing constitutional protections during wartime.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4b5e4c81909950b17151eb0951 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9157ce6b88190b16592cc48244db3 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f5f688ad2481909d11782c44b3217f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:49 p.m.