Triple
T6724452
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Native American sovereignty |
E153476
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicallyArticulatedIn |
P73367
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States v. Kagama (1886) |
E330551
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Kagama (1886) | Statement: [Native American sovereignty, historicallyArticulatedIn, United States v. Kagama (1886)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Kagama (1886) Context triple: [Native American sovereignty, historicallyArticulatedIn, United States v. Kagama (1886)]
-
A.
United States v. Kagama
chosen
United States v. Kagama is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority over crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations, reinforcing congressional power in Indian affairs.
-
B.
Insular Cases
The Insular Cases are a series of early 20th-century U.S. Supreme Court decisions that defined the constitutional status and rights of residents in American overseas territories.
-
C.
Yasui v. United States
Yasui v. United States was a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime conviction of Minoru Yasui for violating a military-imposed curfew on Japanese Americans, thereby affirming the government’s authority to restrict their civil liberties during World War II.
-
D.
Slaughter-House Cases
The Slaughter-House Cases were an 1873 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowly interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause, significantly limiting its protection of civil rights against state infringement.
-
E.
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
Yick Wo v. Hopkins is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially discriminatory enforcement of a facially neutral law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69c6880afb988190ad88011b48ecfcba |
completed | March 27, 2026, 1:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69c6d7c94bac8190ae4b236d1b04bec9 |
completed | March 27, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69c700a34e248190ba9d73437b19a96d |
completed | March 27, 2026, 10:11 p.m. |
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:08 p.m.