Kentucky v. Dennison
E261345
Kentucky v. Dennison was an 1861 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that federal courts could not compel state governors to carry out interstate extradition.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Kentucky v. Dennison canonical | 4 |
| Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Dennison | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T2362325 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kentucky v. Dennison Context triple: [Extradition Clause, interpretedInCase, Kentucky v. Dennison]
-
A.
Chisholm v. Georgia
Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
-
B.
Washington v. Davis
Washington v. Davis is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that held laws or policies with a racially disproportionate impact do not violate the Equal Protection Clause absent proof of discriminatory intent.
-
C.
Slaughter-House Cases
The Slaughter-House Cases were an 1873 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowly interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause, significantly limiting its protection of civil rights against state infringement.
-
D.
Cohens v. Virginia
Cohens v. Virginia is an 1821 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed the Court’s authority to review state criminal proceedings involving federal law, strengthening federal judicial power over the states.
-
E.
United States v. Cruikshank
United States v. Cruikshank was an 1876 U.S. Supreme Court decision that severely limited federal enforcement of civil rights protections, especially against racially motivated violence in the Reconstruction-era South.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kentucky v. Dennison Target entity description: Kentucky v. Dennison was an 1861 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that federal courts could not compel state governors to carry out interstate extradition.
-
A.
Chisholm v. Georgia
Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
-
B.
Washington v. Davis
Washington v. Davis is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that held laws or policies with a racially disproportionate impact do not violate the Equal Protection Clause absent proof of discriminatory intent.
-
C.
Slaughter-House Cases
The Slaughter-House Cases were an 1873 U.S. Supreme Court decision that narrowly interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause, significantly limiting its protection of civil rights against state infringement.
-
D.
Cohens v. Virginia
Cohens v. Virginia is an 1821 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed the Court’s authority to review state criminal proceedings involving federal law, strengthening federal judicial power over the states.
-
E.
United States v. Cruikshank
United States v. Cruikshank was an 1876 U.S. Supreme Court decision that severely limited federal enforcement of civil rights protections, especially against racially motivated violence in the Reconstruction-era South.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
extradition case ⓘ federal courts case ⓘ |
| category |
United States Supreme Court cases
ⓘ
surface form:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Taney Court
United States Supreme Court cases on extradition ⓘ United States Supreme Court cases on federalism ⓘ |
| chiefJusticeAuthor |
Roger Brooke Taney
ⓘ
surface form:
Roger B. Taney
|
| citation | 65 U.S. (24 How.) 66 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted |
Article IV, Section 2 of the United States Constitution
ⓘ
surface form:
Article IV, Section 2, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution
Extradition Clause ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| courtTerm | December Term 1860–1861 ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1861 ⓘ |
| decisionType | unanimous decision ⓘ |
| docketNumber | unknown ⓘ |
| effectOnFederalism |
limited federal power over state executives
ⓘ
reinforced state autonomy in the context of extradition ⓘ |
| fullCaseName |
Kentucky v. Dennison
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Dennison
|
| governorInvolved | Governor of Ohio ⓘ |
| hasJurisdiction | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| historicalContext | decided shortly before the American Civil War ⓘ |
| holding |
Federal courts could not compel state governors to comply with interstate extradition requests
ⓘ
The federal government lacked power to issue a writ of mandamus to a state governor to enforce the Extradition Clause ⓘ |
| impact | long governed federal–state extradition practice until overruled ⓘ |
| languageOfProceeding | English ⓘ |
| legalDoctrine | non-coercion of state governors by federal courts (as originally held) ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
availability of mandamus against a state governor in federal court
ⓘ
interpretation of the Extradition Clause of the U.S. Constitution ⓘ scope of federal power over state officials ⓘ |
| opinionAuthor |
Roger Brooke Taney
ⓘ
surface form:
Roger B. Taney
|
| overruledBy | Puerto Rico v. Branstad ⓘ |
| overruledByDecisionDate | 1987 ⓘ |
| party |
Kentucky
ⓘ
surface form:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
William Dennison Jr. ⓘ
surface form:
William Dennison
|
| partyRole |
Kentucky
ⓘ
surface form:
Kentucky was the demanding state seeking extradition
William Dennison Jr. ⓘ
surface form:
William Dennison was the Governor of Ohio
|
| relatedCase | Puerto Rico v. Branstad ⓘ |
| remedySought | writ of mandamus against the Governor of Ohio ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| result | writ of mandamus denied ⓘ |
| stateInvolved |
Kentucky
ⓘ
Ohio ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
interstate rendition of fugitives
ⓘ
relationship between state and federal authority ⓘ |
| subsequentHistory |
Puerto Rico v. Branstad
ⓘ
surface form:
its limitation on federal power to compel extradition was overturned in Puerto Rico v. Branstad
|
| timePeriod | 19th century ⓘ |
| volumeInUnitedStatesReports | 65 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Kentucky v. Dennison Description of subject: Kentucky v. Dennison was an 1861 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal power by holding that federal courts could not compel state governors to carry out interstate extradition.
Referenced by (5)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
this entity surface form:
Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Dennison